Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by parallel_chase » Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:10 am
I think there is something wrong with the second statement. While posting a question kindly check if you have posted the question correctly or not.

Statement I is sufficient.

Therefore the answer will be either A or D depending on the second statement.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:32 am
Hi parallel_chase,

About option A.

I simplified the question as follows

Question 1/(b-a) < (a-b)

1 < (b-a) (a-b)

1 > (b-a) (b-a)

1 > (b-a)^2

Is this correct ?

If this is correect then we cant conclude from option A right ?
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:50 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi parallel_chase,

About option A.

I simplified the question as follows

Question 1/(b-a) < (a-b)

1 < (b-a) (a-b)

1 > (b-a) (b-a)

1 > (b-a)^2

Is this correct ?

If this is correect then we cant conclude from option A right ?

I think everything is correct except for the last step.

-1 > (b-a)^2.

If you do this the statement I is sufficient because for any value of a or b it will always be greater than -1, the answer would be no and statement will be sufficient.

Let me know what you think.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:10 am
I make stupid silly mistakes al the time ..
Thanks parallel_chase. i got it
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:18 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:I make stupid silly mistakes al the time ..
Thanks parallel_chase. i got it
Dont thank me yet.

If you notice you cannot simplify the equation, because you dont know the values of a or b weather they are positive or negative, therefore you cannot simplify the equation because you are dividing and multiplying the variables.

If you could do that, this can never be a data sufficiency question.

Hence you have to take the original inequality as is.
Join the discussion

Re: inequality

by Ian Stewart » Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:40 am
arorag wrote:is 1/a-b < b-a ???

1. a<b
2.1> abs a-b
I think the above solutions are overcomplicating matters. From 1:

a < b, so b - a > 0 and a - b < 0.

If a-b is negative, so is 1/(a-b). So of course it's less than b-a, which is positive. Sufficient.

From 2 (which I've understood to say 1 > |a-b|), a-b could be positive or negative. Insufficient. A.

That said, if you did want to do this algebraically, from 1) you know that a-b<0. So if you multiply both sides of the inequality by (a-b), you need to reverse the inequality:

1/(a-b) < (b-a)
1 > (b-a)(a-b)

Then multiplying by -1, we again need to reverse the inequality:

-1 < (a-b)(a-b)
-1 < (a-b)^2

which must be true; (a-b)^2 can't be less than zero.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion