BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality question

Expert replies
by valleeny » Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:18 am
Is x + y > 0 ?
(I) x² - y² > 1
(II) x/y + 1 > 0

(A) Statement (I) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (II) alone is not sufficient

(B) Statement (II) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (I) is not sufficient

(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient

(D) Each statement ALONE is sufficient

(E) Statements (I) and (II) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient

OA : E

With statement II, I arrived at x + y > 0. But why is this not correct to deduce that II is sufficient?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by maihuna » Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:24 am
Is x + y > 0 ?
(I) x² - y² > 1
(II) x/y + 1 > 0

1. (x+y)(x-y) > 1 so (x+y)=1 (x-y)=2 as well as (x+y) = -1 (x-y) = -2 both satisy it. Not suff

2. x+y)/y > 0 so if y>0 then x+y > 0 if y<0 then x+y<0 if y=0 not defined. Not suff

Using 1&2

If (x+y)(x-y) > 1 means if (x+y) > 0 x-y need be > 0 or x>y

Even combining 1&2 we can not deduce anything as we are only sure x>y and not that y>0

E
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:28 pm
From 1, ( x+y) ( x-y) > 1... both x and y can be -ve or +ve to acheive the result.

Hence it is not sufficient

From 2, x > -y.

From this, x can be +ve or -ve.. hence it is not sufficient.

From both (1) and (2), it can't be determined whether x and y are +ve or -ve. Hence answer is E.

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion