BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality ques???

Expert replies
by pardeep_10sharma » Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:22 am
If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?

(1) 7x - 2y > 0

(2) -y < x

By me Ans shoud be :- A as it fits all the parameters of being positive.

But ans given by test makers is :- E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by asamaverick » Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:31 am
What made you go for a A?
(1) gives is 7x > 2y
Consider these x = 1, = 2. Yes y > 0
x = 2, y = -1. No y < 0

So A is not the right answer.

We can easily prove that (2) alone is not sufficient.

Combining the two:

7x -2y > 0
x + y > 0

Multiply second one by 2 and add. This gives.
9 x > 0
So all we know is x is positive. This still is not enough to say if y > 0. Hence E.
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:25 am
We are being asked if y is positive - given the parameters that x is positive and 7x-2y>0 this is an algebra inequality so we have to be careful about signs and may need to solve for actual values.

1 says 7x>2y - which means that 7/2(x)>y = so we know that some positive number is greater than y - this doesn't tell us whether y is positive or negative so it is insufficient. BCE

2. Says that -y<x - we know here that x is positive so we know that -y is less than a positive number. This still leaves both positive and negative options open - either y is negative so basically the positive value of y is less than another positive - or y is positive and teh negative value of y is less thana positive number - this isn't enough information.

if you put them together both statements allow for positive and negative values for y -and together they offer no new information - so the answer is E.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by jube » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:30 am
asamaverick wrote: Combining the two:

7x -2y > 0
x + y > 0

Multiply second one by 2 and add. This gives.
9 x > 0
So all we know is x is positive. This still is not enough to say if y > 0. Hence E.
So why can't you multiply the 2nd equation by 7 which will give you:

7x - 2y > 0
7x + 7y > 0

and then subtract the 2 eqns which will give you -9y > 0 i.e. y HAS to be < 0 in which case the answer has to be C.

I'm guessing there's something I'm missing out when solving the 2 inequalities simultaneously. Can someone help me understand what it is? Should you NOT solve inequalities simultaneously? Thanks.
Join the discussion

by asamaverick » Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:03 pm
jube wrote:
So why can't you multiply the 2nd equation by 7 which will give you:

7x - 2y > 0
7x + 7y > 0

and then subtract the 2 eqns which will give you -9y > 0
As a general rule, you can add inequalities but not subtract them.
For example, consider:

6 > 4 and
4 > 1

we can add them and know that:

10 > 5

but we can't subtract them and get:

2 > 3
Join the discussion

by blaster » Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:09 am
A cann't be sufficient ,simply because even if x>y then,we can't not say that y>0 . check it out x=2 , y = 1 and x=2 , y=-1
Join the discussion