BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality (Pearson gmat practice)

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by thegmatbeater » Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:10 am
Anybody?
Join the discussion

Re: Inequality (Pearson gmat practice)

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:52 am
thegmatbeater wrote:In xy plane y=3x+2 contain (r,s)

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

I think each statement alone is sufficent..But it is wrong!
The point (r,s) is on the line only if s = 3r + 2. If you look at either statement, you have a product of two factors which is equal to zero. That guarantees that one (not both) of the two factors is equal to zero. So, for example, from 2):

Either 4r-6-s = 0 --> s = 4r - 6
or: 3r+2-s = 0 --> s = 3r + 2

Only in the second case is the point certain to be on the line.

The first statement leads to a similar conclusion. So neither statement is sufficient alone. If you consider the two statements together, the point is either on the line y = 3x +2, or it is simultaneously on the lines y = 4x - 6 and y = 4x +9, which is impossible because these are distinct parallel lines.
Join the discussion

In xy plane y=3x+2 contain (r,s)

by psriniva » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:13 pm
In xy plane y=3x+2 contain (r,s)

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

I think each statement alone is sufficent..But it is wrong!

I think tht the answer should be "C"

This is because when you consider statement 1 alone, there are 2 solutions: either s = 3r + 2 or s = 4r + 9. So, statement 1 is not sufficient.

when you consider statement 2 alone, there are 2 solutions again.
either s = 4r - 6 or s = 3r - 2. so, statement 2 is not sufficient.

But, when you consider both statements, there is only one common solution which s = 3r - 2.
So, we know for sure that (r,s) is on y = 3x + 2.

Let me know if C is the correct answer?
Thanks
Paddy
Paddy Srinivas
Join the discussion

Re: In xy plane y=3x+2 contain (r,s)

by tparekh » Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:22 pm
psriniva wrote: But, when you consider both statements, there is only one common solution which s = 3r - 2.
So, we know for sure that (r,s) is on y = 3x + 2.

Let me know if C is the correct answer?
Thanks
Paddy
This might be silly, but how does having one common solution given
the 2 statements guarantee that (r,s) is on y=3x + 2?

thanks,
TP
Join the discussion

by BlueRain » Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:38 pm
Given the combination of statement (1) and (2), if (r,s) is NOT on the y=3x+2 line, then that means the (r,s) pair must satisfy both s=4r+9 AND s=4r-6 since (3r+2-s) cannot be zero.

Since there are no (r,s) pair that can simultaneously satisfy both s=4r+9 and s=4r-6, (r,s) must be on the y=3x+2.
Join the discussion