BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequalities

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Italy
Thanked: 1 times

by Carlo75 » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:05 am
the question is: is w - y > 0 ?
Last edited by Carlo75 on Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

Re: inequalities

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:18 am
Carlo75 wrote:If w + x <0>0?


(1) x+y < 0

(2) y < x < y

please explanations ...
Hi Carlo,

Could you type the question again? Statement 2, of course, doesn't make much sense as it's written! I've just learned myself that using < and > can call up html tags, so you should click the 'Disable HTML in this post' button before submitting to make things read correctly.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by netigen » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:55 am
A is insufficient

Given w + x <0

w +x - y < -y
w - y < -(x+y)

since we know that x+y<0

so, w-y < z where z is +ve number

B has been incorrectly posted.
Last edited by netigen on Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Italy
Thanked: 1 times

by Carlo75 » Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:00 am
OA is B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Italy
Thanked: 1 times

by Carlo75 » Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:09 am
You have shown that (w-y) < -(x+y) because x +y < 0 the answer, is w - y >0 ?, could be YES so it is insufficient.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:28 pm

by sasi78 » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:16 am
As per question,
w+x<0> w+x-y<y> w-y<-(x+y).

Stem1: x+y<0> w-y <x>0. But we can not say w-y is <or> 0. Hence, this is not sufficient.

Stem2: y<x<w> Add -y to all, 0<x-y<w> w-y >0. Hence, this is sufficient.

So, answer is B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:28 pm

by sasi78 » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:23 am
There was a formatting problem in my earlier reply. pl refer this.

As per question,
w+x<0. this can be writen as (w+x-y)<y then, (w-y)<-(x+y).

Stem1: x+y<0. So (w-y)<x> 0. But we can't say (w-y) is <or> 0. Hence, this is not sufficient.

Stem2: y<x<w. Add -y to all, 0<(x-y)<w>0. Hence, this is sufficient.

So, answer is B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1