• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## In the xy-plane, if line k has negative slope, is the ##### This topic has 2 expert replies and 1 member reply ### Top Member ## In the xy-plane, if line k has negative slope, is the ## Timer 00:00 ## Your Answer A B C D E ## Global Stats Difficult In the xy-plane, if line k has negative slope, is the y-intercept of line k positive? (1) The x-intercept of line k is less than the y-intercept of line k. (2) The slope of line k is less than -2. OA C Source: Veritas Prep ### GMAT/MBA Expert Elite Legendary Member Joined 23 Jun 2013 Posted: 10071 messages Followed by: 494 members Upvotes: 2867 GMAT Score: 800 Top Reply Hi All, We're told that in the xy-plane, Line K has NEGATIVE slope. We're asked if the y-intercept of Line K is positive. This is a YES/NO question. It can be solved in a couple of different ways, including by TESTing VALUES. To start, with a negative slope, BOTH the x-intercept and y-intercept of Line K will have the same 'sign' (meaning they are both positive, both negative or both 0). 1) The x-intercept of Line K is less than the y-intercept of Line K. Since Line K has a NEGATIVE slope, we know that the line goes "down and to the right", but we know nothing about where it crosses the X-axis or Y-axis. With the information in Fact 1, the x-intercept and y-intercept could be: x-intercept = 2 y-intercept = 3, the slope = -3/2 and the answer to the question is YES x-intercept = -2 y-intercept = -1, the slope = -1/2 and the answer to the question is NO Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT 2) The slope of line k is less than -2. Fact 2 tells us NOTHING about where the line appears on the graph, so it's possible that the y-intercept could be positive (a YES answer) or 0 (a NO answer) or negative (also a NO answer). Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Combined, we know... -The x-intercept of Line K is less than the y-intercept of Line K. -The slope of line k is less than -2. For the slope to be LESS than -2 AND the x-intercept to be LESS than the y-intercept, the only possibility exists when both intercepts are POSITIVE. If the two intercepts are negative, then the x-intercept would actually be GREATER than the y-intercept (and that option does not 'fit' what we're told). Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES. Combined, SUFFICIENT Final Answer: C GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich _________________ Contact Rich at Rich.C@empowergmat.com ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 09 Oct 2010 Posted: 1273 messages Followed by: 29 members Upvotes: 59 Top Reply BTGmoderatorDC wrote: In the xy-plane, if line k has negative slope, is the y-intercept of line k positive? (1) The x-intercept of line k is less than the y-intercept of line k. (2) The slope of line k is less than -2. Source: Veritas Prep In the image attached, we have proved that each statement alone is insufficient through GEOMETRIC BIFURCATIONS. $\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,$ ${x_{\,k}}\,\, = \,\,{\left( {x - {\text{intercept}}} \right)_{\,k}}$ ${y_{\,k}}\,\, = \,\,{\left( {y - {\text{intercept}}} \right)_{\,k}}\,\,$ ${\text{slop}}{{\text{e}}_{\,k}}\,\,\, < \,\,\,\,0$ ${y_{\,k}}\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,\,0$ $\underline {{x_k} = 0} \,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( 1 \right)} \,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered} {y_k} > 0 \hfill \\ {\text{slop}}{{\text{e}}_{\,k}}\,\,\, < \,\,\,\,0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\underline {{x_k} > 0} \,\,\,\,\,\,{\text{impossible}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,{x_k} \ne 0$ $\left( {{x_k} \ne 0} \right)\,\,\,\,\, - \frac{{{y_{\,k}}}}{{{x_{\,k}}}}\,\, = \,\,\,\frac{{{y_{\,k}} - 0}}{{0 - {x_{\,k}}\,}}\,\,\,{\text{ = }}\,\,\,\,{\text{slop}}{{\text{e}}_{\,k}}\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered} < \,\,\,\,0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\,{y_k}\,\,,\,\,{x_k}\,\,{\text{same}}\,\,{\text{signs}}\,\,\,\,\,\left( {{\text{both}}\,\, \ne 0\,\,} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( * \right) \hfill \\ \mathop < \limits^{\left( 2 \right)} - 2\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\, - \frac{{{y_{\,k}}}}{{{x_{\,k}}}} < - 2\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\frac{{{y_{\,k}}}}{{{x_{\,k}}}} > 2\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {**} \right)\, \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$ $\underline {{y_k} < 0} \,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\,{x_k} < 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( {**} \right)} \,\,\,\,\,\,{y_{\,k}} < \,\,\,2\,\,{x_{\,k}}\,\,\,\mathop < \limits^{{x_k}\,\, < \,\,0} \,\,\,{x_k}\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\underline {\,\left( 1 \right)\,\,\,{\text{contradicted}}\,}$ $\left. \begin{gathered} {y_k} < 0\,\,\,{\text{false}}\,\,\, \hfill \\ {y_k}\,\, \ne 0\,\,\,\,\left( * \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right\}\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{y_k} > 0\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,{\text{SUFF}}.$ This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method. Regards, Fabio. _________________ Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT) English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 17 Aug 2018 Posted: 9 messages Hi, Basic knowledge of slopes and intercepts of line is required to solve this question. Remember: We can always draw and visualize and co-ordinate geometry question to solve it faster. Given: Line K has negative slope, If the line k is not passing through the origin and has negative slope then the intercepts will have same signs. You can draw and visualize the lines to understand it better. Statement I is insufficient: The x-intercept of line k is less than the y-intercept of line k. We cant say whether line k has positive y-intercept with this statement. For example, if line k has intercept points as (0,4) and (2,0) where Y-intercept is greater than the X-intercept. So answer to the question would be YES here. But if line k has intercept point as (-4,0) and (0,-2), where Y-intercept is greater than the X-intercept. But answer to the question would be NO here. Statement II is insufficient: The slope of line k is less than -2. We can take the same above example here for YES answer, Where the slope is negative 2 and answer to the question is YES. But answer to the question would be NO too. For example, if the line passes through the origin, then both the intercepts are zero. Lets say the line is y = -2x, Where slope is -2, but the y-intercept is not positive. So not sufficient. Both statement together are sufficient, Since x-intercept of line k is less than the y-intercept of line k and also slope is negative 2 only way to achieve this is if both the intercepts are positive. Hence Y intercept is positive So, the answer is C. Together sufficient. • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for \$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow 65 first replies
2 fskilnik@GMATH 61 first replies
3 GMATGuruNY 46 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 40 first replies
5 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 26 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

199 posts
2 fskilnik@GMATH

GMATH Teacher

163 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

119 posts
4 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

92 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

72 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts