BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In the earliest stages of the common law, a party could have

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:00 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In the earliest stages of the common law, a party could have a case heard by a judge only upon the payment of a fee to the court, and then only if the case fit within one of the forms for which there existed a writ. At first the number of such formalized cases of action was very small, but judges invented new forms which brought more cases and greater revenues.

Which of the following conclusions is most strongly suggested by the paragraph above?

(A) Early judges often decided cases in an arbitrary and haphazard manner.

(B) In most early cases, the plaintiff rather than the defendant prevailed.

(C) The judiciary at first had greater power than either the legislature or the executive.

(D) One of the motivating forces for the early expansion in judicial power was economic considerations.

(E) The first common law decisions were inconsistent with one another and did not form a coherent body of law.

OA D

Source: Magoosh
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

...

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 06, 2019 2:29 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This is not necessarily as the case may be. The early judges had a protocol that must be adhered to by parties involved in order to proceed with the case. So, the argument doesn't suggest that it's in an arbitrary and haphazard manner.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
The argument made no mention or indicates the prevailing party in the earliest stages of the common law. So, it cannot serve as a conclusion suggested by the argument.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
There is no evidence in this statement that show who out of the three arms if government has the greatest power. So, it can't serve as a conclusion drawn from the given information.

OPTION D - CORRECT
Due to the practise of the earliest stages of the common law, the number of such formalised cases of action was very small which led to the invention of new forms by the judges which brought more cases and greater revenues.
The greater revenues being referred to can be related to the economic considerations. Therefore, this option is strongly suggested by the statement due to this.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
This option is not strongly suggested by the argument because whether or not, the first common law decisions were inconsistent without one another is unknown and wasn't included in the information given.
Join the discussion