OPTION A - INCORRECT
This is not necessarily as the case may be. The early judges had a protocol that must be adhered to by parties involved in order to proceed with the case. So, the argument doesn't suggest that it's in an arbitrary and haphazard manner.
OPTION B - INCORRECT
The argument made no mention or indicates the prevailing party in the earliest stages of the common law. So, it cannot serve as a conclusion suggested by the argument.
OPTION C - INCORRECT
There is no evidence in this statement that show who out of the three arms if government has the greatest power. So, it can't serve as a conclusion drawn from the given information.
OPTION D - CORRECT
Due to the practise of the earliest stages of the common law, the number of such formalised cases of action was very small which led to the invention of new forms by the judges which brought more cases and greater revenues.
The greater revenues being referred to can be related to the economic considerations. Therefore, this option is strongly suggested by the statement due to this.
OPTION E - INCORRECT
This option is not strongly suggested by the argument because whether or not, the first common law decisions were inconsistent without one another is unknown and wasn't included in the information given.