BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Illegal Immigrants

Expert replies
by umaa » Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:51 am
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, illegal immigration is an important issue in the current race for mayor. Of the two candidates for mayor, one supports a plan that would attempt to deport the city’s 9,000 illegal immigrants and the other does not. Surveys consistently show that about 60% of the city’s residents are opposed to the plan, while about 35% are in support of the plan. Therefore, the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor.

All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT:

In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.

Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.

Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.

The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.

Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.

OA is B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by myohmy » Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:24 am
In this case, the analyst's argument is that the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor, since 60% of the city's residents also oppose the plan.

Now we are looking for what does not weaken the above argument.

A) In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.

No. In fact, this weakens the argument, because it states that voters will decide on issues unrelated to the immigration plan.

B) Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.

Yes. This is irrelevant, and neither strengthens nor weakens the analyst's argument.

C) Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.

No. This also weakens the argument since the 60% of city residents opposing the plan is irrelevant, if none are registered voters.

D) The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.

No. This also weakens the argument because it suggests that the candidate who supports the plan could win even though he's taken a controversial stance.

E) Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.

Again, this weakens the argument since logically, illegal immigrants would oppose the plan, but, as in C, that won't ensure a win, since illegal immigrants can't vote.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:05 am
what's the source of this question?
Join the discussion

by umaa » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:09 am
myohmy, Thanks. Got the point.

aj5105, Its from OG 10.
Join the discussion

by myohmy » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:40 am
No problem =) I got this question wrong the first time I did it -- all the double negatives ("do not oppose" and the like) were just screwing with my brain.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:08 pm
Why is it logical to assume that illegal immigrants are a part of the poll/survey? How is that, to use the GMAT's wording, a common sense assumption?
Join the discussion

by myohmy » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:16 pm
Well "city residents" implies "people who live in the city." There are 9000 illegal immigrants living in the city, therefore, they are city residents.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:17 pm
myohmy wrote:Well "city residents" implies "people who live in the city." There are 9000 illegal immigrants living in the city, therefore, they are city residents.
Thanks
Join the discussion

by Eric77Gorm » Sun May 15, 2016 11:47 pm
It's pretty clear to be option B
Join the discussion