BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

if-would or had-would ?

Expert replies
by MakeUrTimeCount » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:44 am
In addition to the great benefits mankind has enjoyed since the discovery of certain technologies, many atrocities would have been prevented had the scientists who made the discoveries had the wisdom to discard such power.

A) had the scientists who made the discoveries had
B) if the scientists who made the discoveries have had
C) if the scientists who made the discoveries had
D) had the scientists who made the discoveries have
E) had the scientists who made the discoveries showed

OA: A

Let's discuss...
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:57 am
MakeUrTimeCount wrote:In addition to the great benefits mankind has enjoyed since the discovery of certain technologies, many atrocities would have been prevented had the scientists who made the discoveries had the wisdom to discard such power.

A) had the scientists who made the discoveries had
B) if the scientists who made the discoveries have had
C) if the scientists who made the discoveries had
D) had the scientists who made the discoveries have
E) had the scientists who made the discoveries showed

OA: A

Let's discuss...
If John HAD had enough money, he WOULD HAVE paid for dinner.

IF + PAST PERFECT + WOULD HAVE is used to express PAST actions that are HYPOTHETICAL/CONTRARY-TO-FACT.
The meaning conveyed here is that John DIDN'T have enough money, so he DIDN'T pay for dinner.

The following express the same meaning:

HAD John had enough money, he WOULD HAVE paid for dinner.
John WOULD HAVE paid for dinner, HAD he had enough money.


This last structure is employed by the original sentence in the SC above:

Many atrocities WOULD HAVE been prevented HAD the scientists had the wisdom to discard such power.

The meaning conveyed is that the scientists DID NOT have the widsom, so the atrocities were NOT prevented.

Thus, the sentence is correct as written.

The correct answer is A.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Johnkate » Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:11 am
Hi Mitch,

Doesn't (A) has run-over sentence?
John Kate
-------------------
https://krazzytech.com
Join the discussion

by MakeUrTimeCount » Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:30 am
Thanks Milch.

I totallz agree with you on the meaning of the sentence and did not find any thing wrong with the sentence. I have used this construction before, but somehow had doubt about the authenticity of the statement as per GMAT standards. Your reference to OG question has clarified that doubt.

Could you please share your views on B and C. Especially how could one reject C.
Is there any other way to reject these choices except for the subjunctive mood (past tense of whose, I was not aware with).

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:22 pm
MakeUrTimeCount wrote:Thanks Milch.

I totallz agree with you on the meaning of the sentence and did not find any thing wrong with the sentence. I have used this construction before, but somehow had doubt about the authenticity of the statement as per GMAT standards. Your reference to OG question has clarified that doubt.

Could you please share your views on B and C. Especially how could one reject C.
Is there any other way to reject these choices except for the subjunctive mood (past tense of whose, I was not aware with).

Thanks
If John HAD enough money, he WOULD pay for dinner.

IF + SIMPLE PAST + WOULD is used to express PRESENT actions that are HYPOTHETICAL/CONTRARY-TO-FACT.
The meaning conveyed here is that John DOESN'T have enough money, so he CAN'T pay for dinner.

In C, if the scientists HAD the wisdom (a present action) does not agree with many atrocities WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED (a past action).
In B, if the scientists HAVE HAD the wisdom (present perfect) does not agree with many atrocities WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED (a past action).
All the verbs should be in the same tense unless a change in tense is required.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1