BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If w + x is < 0, is w - y > 0?

Expert replies
by gmatdriller » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:25 am
After several failed searches for the question, I have decided to post it.

Don't know why [spoiler](1) /spoiler] is wrong.

If w + x is < 0, is w - y > 0?
(1) x + y < 0
(2) y < x < w

seems correct to solve this way:
combining stem (w+x < 0) with (1) - x+y<0, we have the 2 inequalities:

w + x < 0............(i)
x + y < 0.............(ii)
............................ SUBTRACTING (i) from (ii)
w - y < 0 If w<y, definitely w CANNOT be greater than y
(question asked) at the same time...SUFFICIENT
Correct response is NO "w is NOT > y" as asked.

(ii) I have no issues with that.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:39 am
gmatdriller wrote:After several failed searches for the question, I have decided to post it.

Don't know why [spoiler](1) /spoiler] is wrong.

If w + x is < 0, is w - y > 0?
(1) x + y < 0
(2) y < x < w

seems correct to solve this way:
combining stem (w+x < 0) with (1) - x+y<0, we have the 2 inequalities:

w + x < 0............(i)
x + y < 0.............(ii)
............................ SUBTRACTING (i) from (ii)
w - y < 0 If w<y, definitely w CANNOT be greater than y
(question asked) at the same time...SUFFICIENT
Correct response is NO "w is NOT > y" as asked.

(ii) I have no issues with that.
You cannot subtract inequalities like this. It's not equation! Only thing we know from question stem and statement 1 is both (w + x) and (x + y) is less than zero. We don't which one of them is greater than the other. When you're subtracting (x + y) from (w + x) it could be positive or negative. For example say, (w + x) = -4 and (x + y) = -7 => (w + x) - (x + y) = 3 > 0.

But we can add them and say (w + 2x + y) < 0, because there is no way addition of two negative number will result in a positive number.

Hope it helps.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:59 pm
What is OA of this quistion ?
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:08 pm
Rahul, i got it now.
While the differecnce between two negatives can be either positive or
negative, their sum is always negative.


Thanks.
Source: GMATPrep
OA is B.
Last edited by gmatdriller on Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by junegmat221 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:47 pm
@Rahul,
Can u please detail us on what are the strict guidelines to be followed ,
When dealing with inequalities like the one above.
You cannot subtract inequalities like this. It's not equation! Only thing we know from question stem and statement 1 is both (w + x) and (x + y) is less than zero. We don't which one of them is greater than the other. When you're subtracting (x + y) from (w + x) it could be positive or negative. For example say, (w + x) = -4 and (x + y) = -7 => (w + x) - (x + y) = 3 > 0.
It would be of much help..
Thanks..
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:06 pm
junegmat221 wrote:@Rahul,
Can u please detail us on what are the strict guidelines to be followed ,
When dealing with inequalities like the one above.

It would be of much help..
Thanks..
Always cases:
  • Positive + Positive = Always positive
    Positive - Negative = Always positive
    Negative - Positive = Always negative
    Negative + Negative = Always negative
We can add or subtract accordingly without any problem or error.

May be cases:
  • Any combination other than those above are may be positive or negative.
We cannot add or subtract them to get a sure result unless there are other conditions involved.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion