BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If the lengths of the sides of a triangle are a, b, and 7

Expert replies
by gmat_winter » Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:32 am
If the lengths of the sides of a triangle are a, b, and 7, which of the following could be the value of a - b?

1)4
11)7
111)12

I only
II only
I and II only
II and III only
I, II, and III

OAA
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:37 am
This question is testing the Third Side Rule of triangles: the third side of a triangle must always be less than the sum of the other two sides, and greater than the difference.

In this case, 7 must less than the sum of the other two sides, and 7 < a + b

And 7 must be greater than the difference of the other two sides, so 7 > a - b; This is the same as a - b < 7. We're concerned about a - b, so this is the relevant fact here.

If a - b < 7, then only 4 will work as a value of a - b

Answer is A
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:43 am
gmat_winter wrote:If the lengths of the sides of a triangle are a, b, and 7, which of the following could be the value of a - b?

1)4
11)7
111)12

I only
II only
I and II only
II and III only
I, II, and III

OAA
IMPORTANT RULE: If two sides of a triangle have lengths A and B, then . . .
difference between sides A and B < third side < sum of sides A and B

Plugging in we get: a - b < 7 < a + b
So, a - b < 7
Answer: A

RELATED RESOURCE:
We explain HOW and WHY the rule (above) works in the following video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/860 (starting at 1:50)

Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:52 pm
Hi gmat_winter,

This question is based on the Triangle Inequality Theorem, as the other posters have noted. Since the three Roman Numerals are all numbers, and the question asks what COULD be the value of A-B, you can take more of a 'hands-on' approach and TEST VALUES (instead of trying to handle this with the broad rules that the Theorem is base don.

We know that one of the three sides is a 7

I. COULD the difference in the other two sides be 4?

If the sides were 11 and 7, then we'd have an isosceles triangle with sides of 7, 7 and 11. The difference COULD be 4.
Roman Numeral I is possible.

II. COULD the difference in the other two sides be 7?

If the sides were 8 and 1, then we would not have a triangle - we'd have a line "on top" of another line (since 1+7 = 8).
If the sides were 9 and 2, then we'd have the same situation.
If the sides were 10 and 3, then we'd have the same situation.
Etc.
Roman Numeral II is NOT possible

III. COULD the difference in the other two sides be 12?

If the sides were 13 and 1, then the "1" and the "7" could not meet (they're too far away from one another).
If the sides were 14 and 2, then we'd have the same situation.
If the sides were 15 and 3, then we'd have the same situation.
Etc.
Roman Numeral III is NOT possible.

Only Roman Numeral 1 is possible.

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by a.gold93 » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:10 pm
Hi,

I'm kind of stunned by this question. I though that the rule was that the sum of any 2 sides as to be greater than the 3rd side. If you put a-b = 4, then lets say a=5, b=1, and c=7 (given). 5+1 < 7. 5 and 1 being the 2 sides, 7 being the 3rd side

I'm likely confusing 2 different topics, I would appreciate if somebody can clarify what I'm missing or doing wrong.

Thanks! Much appreciated!
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:35 pm
a.gold93 wrote:Hi,

I'm kind of stunned by this question. I though that the rule was that the sum of any 2 sides as to be greater than the 3rd side. If you put a-b = 4, then lets say a=5, b=1, and c=7 (given). 5+1 < 7. 5 and 1 being the 2 sides, 7 being the 3rd side

I'm likely confusing 2 different topics, I would appreciate if somebody can clarify what I'm missing or doing wrong.

Thanks! Much appreciated!
What you are doing wrong is extending the question in a way that does not make sense.

The question is asking which of the DIFFERENCES between a and b are possible.

4 is possible. For instance you could have a triangle such that one side has length 4, one has length 8 and the third has length 7.

However you can't extend the idea "a difference of 4 is possible" to make it "any two numbers that differ by 4 work as lengths of the two sides."
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

gmat_winter wrote: ↑
Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:32 am
If the lengths of the sides of a triangle are a, b, and 7, which of the following could be the value of a - b?

1)4
11)7
111)12

I only
II only
I and II only
II and III only
I, II, and III

OAA
Solution:

The triangle inequality theorem tells us that the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side. Thus, we have a - b < 7. Therefore, the only number in the given Roman numeral choices that could be the value of a - b is 4.

Answer: A

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion