Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

If mv<pv<0, is v>0?

Expert replies
by Blocked Brain » Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:35 am
Question from GMAT Test Prep:
If mv<pv<0, is v>0?
(1) m<p
(2) m<0

Answer: Each statement alone is sufficient.

How should I think through this problem? Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Robinmrtha » Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:47 am
the question is asking whether v is positive or negative...
given
mv<pv<0
when v is positive...then
m<p<0
i.e. both m and p are negative but p is greater than m
and if v is negative...then
m>p>0

Statement 1.
We know that m<p
therefore v should be positive...
sufficient

Statement 2.
m<0
for m to be less than 0, the v should always be positive...
sufficient

Hence the answer is D...
Hope this helps....
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:19 am
II :
mv<0
since m=-ve
so v =+ve

I:

m<p

now multiply both sides by v
mv<pv

since the sign of inequality does not change,so we can say v =+ve

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by gmat_for_life » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:38 am
Hello Experts,

Could you please verify if my approach to this question is correct?

we have mv<pv<0 and the question is whether v>0?

We can rewrite the above inequalities as
v(m-p)<0----(1)
mv<0-------(2) and
pv<0----------(3)

from equation 2, we have either m<0 and v>0 or m>0 and v<0
from equation 3, we have either p<0 and v>0 or p>0 and v<0

therefore, for v to be greater than 0, m<0 and p<0. From equation 1, we can state that m-p<0 for v>0. So the question can be rephrased as 'is m<p'?

Statement 1: Sufficient
Statement 2: from equation 2, we know that when m<0, v>0. Hence sufficient.

Thanks,
Amit
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:54 am
Hi Amit,

Your solution is great. Here's a longer version that explains every step:
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

1) m < p
2) m < 0
Nice question.

Target question: Is v > 0

Given: mv < pv < 0

Statement 1: m < p

IMPORTANT: Notice what happens if we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v.
The resulting inequality will depend on whether v is NEGATIVE or POSITIVE. So, let's consider two cases:
case a: v is NEGATIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m > p
We changed the direction of the inequality sign since we divided by a NEGATIVE value.

case b: v is POSITIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m < p
The direction of the inequality sign stayed the same since we divided by a POSITIVE value.

Statement 1 tells us that m < p, which means we can rule out case a.
So, we conclude that v is POSITIVE
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: m < 0
We're told that mv < pv < 0, which means that mv < 0
In other words, the product mv is NEGATIVE
Statement 2 tell us that m is NEGATIVE
In order for the product mv to be NEGATIVE, v must be positive
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:56 am
gmat_for_life wrote:Hello Experts,

Could you please verify if my approach to this question is correct?

we have mv<pv<0 and the question is whether v>0?

We can rewrite the above inequalities as
v(m-p)<0----(1)
mv<0-------(2) and
pv<0----------(3)

from equation 2, we have either m<0 and v>0 or m>0 and v<0
from equation 3, we have either p<0 and v>0 or p>0 and v<0

therefore, for v to be greater than 0, m<0 and p<0. From equation 1, we can state that m-p<0 for v>0. So the question can be rephrased as 'is m<p'?

Statement 1: Sufficient
Statement 2: from equation 2, we know that when m<0, v>0. Hence sufficient.

Thanks,
Amit
The approach is a little bit lengthier than it needs to be, but sure, the mathematical reasoning is valid.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by gmat_for_life » Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:09 am
Thanks a lot David and Brent!

Your solutions and explanations are always helpful :)

I have one more doubt not related to this question but something that has been troubling me since a long time.Could you guys please help me out with this?

if x^2=36, what is x?
I have read numerous posts which state that the answer is |6|, which should yield only '6' as the answer. However the correct answer is either 6 or -6. This logic seems baffling to me! :(

Regards,
Amit
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:19 am
gmat_for_life wrote:Thanks a lot David and Brent!

Your solutions and explanations are always helpful :)

I have one more doubt not related to this question but something that has been troubling me since a long time.Could you guys please help me out with this?

if x^2=36, what is x?
I have read numerous posts which state that the answer is |6|, which should yield only '6' as the answer. However the correct answer is either 6 or -6. This logic seems baffling to me! :(

Regards,
Amit
if x^2=36, we could say that |x| = 6, meaning that x is 6 units from 0 on the number line. (And x is either -6 or 6.) However, it would not be accurate to simply claim that the answer is |6|, because, as you noted, |6| is just 6.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion