look I am going to be placed with the triple accredited (AACSB, EQUIS, AMBA) institution for the fall 2011 for my prospective PhD studies. I have lost nothing, as GMAT has helped me to score a good 780 in quant with the minimum prep for new test format (GRE) last week. I have been convinced that my verbal score sucks, indeed, BUT not below the mark 28(!) as the worst case scenario. I scored 22 in verbal on November 04 2009 without any prep and looking into OG for the test format - SC, RC, CR. Moreover, two years back I ran out of time and guessed on the questions 34-41.gmat7202011 wrote: No one can help you more than yourself. Period
Sorry if i was rude, but i really want you to suck it up and fight it out in a constructive manner.
You are correct,as my score went into history and will be lowering my chances for grad. admissions into top schools for the next 5 years (reportable period). Therefore, I have decided to be guided with not GMAT score.
Thanks for all your help and all considerations articulated. I am convinced more than ever and how it could be said or explained that GMAT exam is BIASED against many factors not cited/listed by the test writers and evaluators. This may not sound "sound" to some high scoring GMAT takers BUT will prompt many serious heads to revisit an idea of taking GMAT in the long run.
last word to the poster here - @artstudent, I don't know what was your implied meaning when you said this:
I could only question: does it take only rare people to score some 20s even? why 16? how much biased you areartstudent wrote: stop being delusional and acting like you are part of some rare portion of the population that's really good at the test but got shafted. there are those people out there. but by definition, chances are you are not one of them. cuz they are rare.
thanks anyway ...