BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

[DS][Numberline] HSPA posts

Expert replies
by HSPA » Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:23 am
On the no line, the ditance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. DOes z lie between x and y on the no line?

1. xyz <0
2. xy <0
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by force5 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:44 am
Can be

z x y
or

x z y

(1) says xyz are -ve which means either case 1 can be true only z -ve
or case 2 can be true with x -ve
or
all three can be negative. ( hence insufficient)

(2) xy -ve ( either one is negative) . which means x has to be negative. but still insuff)

combining- x is negative but y is not from stmnt2 hence the only possible scenario is the second one
x....z...y

Hence C.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:58 am
try again force with below hint

Consider x=-1, z = -2 and y =5
x=-5, z= -6 and y = -1
Y is symmetric around X.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:06 am
IMO E.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by manpsingh87 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:12 am
HSPA wrote:On the no line, the ditance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. DOes z lie between x and y on the no line?

1. xyz <0
2. xy <0
here different cases are possible.
1)xyz<0 x=+ve, y=+ve z=-ve, in this z won't lie between x and y. ( try diff. combinations).
x=+ve, y=-ve, z=+ve in this case also z won't lie between x and y.
x=-ve, y=+ve, z=+ve in this case z may lie between x and y.
hence 1 alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

2) xy<0, x=+ve and y=-ve, or x=-ve and y=+ve
now as no information is provided by z hence 2 alone is also not sufficient to answer the question.

combining 1 and 2.
x=+ve, y=-ve and z =-ve, z won't lie b/w x and y.
x=-ve, y=+ve, z=+ve z may lie between x and y.

as even after combining 1 and 2 we are not able to get the unique solution hence answer should be E.
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion