Hello,
I couldn't figure out how to solve the question below:
The equation of a curve is y = x^2 − 3x + 4.
Show that the whole of the curve lies above the x-axis.
Please help..
How to show that a curve lies above the x-axis?
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Doesn't sound like a GMAT question to me.jspake wrote:Hello,
I couldn't figure out how to solve the question below:
The equation of a curve is y = x^2 − 3x + 4.
Show that the whole of the curve lies above the x-axis.
Please help..
What are the 5 answer choices?
Cheers,
Brent
- kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
Remember the quadratic formula ?
E = ax^2 + bx + c = 0 iff x= (-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac))/2a
if b^2 - 4ac < 0, E=0 has no real roots and E and a have the same sign for all real numbers x
E = ax^2 + bx + c = 0 iff x= (-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac))/2a
if b^2 - 4ac < 0, E=0 has no real roots and E and a have the same sign for all real numbers x
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Since we're helping you with your homework (Algebra II perhaps?), here's another approach.jspake wrote:Hello,
I couldn't figure out how to solve the question below:
The equation of a curve is y = x^2 − 3x + 4.
Show that the whole of the curve lies above the x-axis.
Please help..
Use the Complete the Square technique.
y = x^2 − 3x + 4
y = x^2 − 3x + 2.25 - 2.25 + 4 (completed the square)
y = (x - 1.5)^2 - 2.25 + 4 (factored)
y = (x - 1.5)^2 + 1.75 (simplified)
So, this parabola has its vertex at coordinates (1.5, 1.75), which means the vertex is above the x-axis.
Since the parabola opens up (which I'll leave you to convince your teacher of
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Aside: For those studying for the GMAT (i.e., the vast majority of viewers), the Completing the Square technique is out of scope for the GMAT.
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:09 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
Since a(the coefficient of quadratic equation) is greater than 0 and the determinant(b2)< 4ac, therfore it will be a parabola with face upwards and since determinant is not equal t zero it will be above x-axis and not touch it
- The Iceman
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:14 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 47 times
- Followed by:6 members
Suppose we have a quadratic ax^2+bx+c=0
First, the sign of the coefficient of x^2 determines whether the parabola opens upwards or downwards. (a>0=> parabola opens up, and a<0=> parabola opens downwards)
Case 1: D=0 => Touches x axis at one point (significance: both roots real and equal)
Case 2: D>0 => Cuts x axis at two point (significance: the two roots are real and distinct)
Case 3: D<0 => Does not touch/cut/intercept x axis at any point (significance: both are non real roots)
First, the sign of the coefficient of x^2 determines whether the parabola opens upwards or downwards. (a>0=> parabola opens up, and a<0=> parabola opens downwards)
Case 1: D=0 => Touches x axis at one point (significance: both roots real and equal)
Case 2: D>0 => Cuts x axis at two point (significance: the two roots are real and distinct)
Case 3: D<0 => Does not touch/cut/intercept x axis at any point (significance: both are non real roots)