If # represents one of the operations +, -, x and /, is (a#b)(c#d)=d(b#a)#c(b#a) for all numbers a, b, c and d?
(1). a(b#c)=ab#ac
(2). c#d not equal to d#c
OA is B
Please help in solving this questions
Thanks & Regards
Sachin
If # represents one of the operations +, -, x and /,
This topic has expert replies
- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
In order to understand the question, we must first determine what each operation would do in this context.
If # is addition:
(a + b)(c + d) = ac + ad + bc + bd
and
d(b + a) + c(b + a) = bd + ad + bc + ac
These would be equal.
If # is subtraction,
(a - b)(c - d) = ac - ad - bc + bd
and
d(b - a) + c(b - a) = bd - ad + bc - ac
The last two have different signs, so these are not equal.
If # is multiplication,
(ab)(cd) = abcd
and
d(ba)c(ba) = (a^2)(b^2)cd
These are not equal.
If # is division,
(a/b)(c/d) = ac/bd
and
d(b/a)/c(b/a) = d/b
Not equal.
So the question is really asking... does # represent addition?
1) a(b#c)=ab#ac
This would be true if # was addition or subtraction.
(2) c#d not equal to d#c
This tells us that # cannot represent addition, otherwise they would be equal. So we know that the answer to the question is definitively "no." Sufficient.
If # is addition:
(a + b)(c + d) = ac + ad + bc + bd
and
d(b + a) + c(b + a) = bd + ad + bc + ac
These would be equal.
If # is subtraction,
(a - b)(c - d) = ac - ad - bc + bd
and
d(b - a) + c(b - a) = bd - ad + bc - ac
The last two have different signs, so these are not equal.
If # is multiplication,
(ab)(cd) = abcd
and
d(ba)c(ba) = (a^2)(b^2)cd
These are not equal.
If # is division,
(a/b)(c/d) = ac/bd
and
d(b/a)/c(b/a) = d/b
Not equal.
So the question is really asking... does # represent addition?
1) a(b#c)=ab#ac
This would be true if # was addition or subtraction.
(2) c#d not equal to d#c
This tells us that # cannot represent addition, otherwise they would be equal. So we know that the answer to the question is definitively "no." Sufficient.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I'd like to point out how much easier Ceilidh made that question by taking the target question, Is (a#b)(c#d)=d(b#a)#c(b#a)?, rephrasing it to get Does # represent addition?.
This is an important strategy that can help us solve Data Sufficiency questions faster and easier, so be sure to watch for opportunities to rephrase the target question.
Aside: we have a free video covering this strategy: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100
Also, here are some additional Data Sufficiency questions that you can practice the strategy with:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/pls-help-x-2 ... 79970.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/good-ds-t270904.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-focus-ds-3-t277927.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-query-t276597.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/powers-and-i ... 77249.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mgmat-the-po ... 77596.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/calculate-th ... 99347.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/coordiante-p ... 72785.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-proble ... 76424.html
Cheers,
Brent
For even more information on rephrasing the target question, you can read this article I wrote for BTG: https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2014/06/ ... t-question
This is an important strategy that can help us solve Data Sufficiency questions faster and easier, so be sure to watch for opportunities to rephrase the target question.
Aside: we have a free video covering this strategy: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100
Also, here are some additional Data Sufficiency questions that you can practice the strategy with:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/pls-help-x-2 ... 79970.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/good-ds-t270904.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-focus-ds-3-t277927.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-query-t276597.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/powers-and-i ... 77249.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mgmat-the-po ... 77596.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/calculate-th ... 99347.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/coordiante-p ... 72785.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-proble ... 76424.html
Cheers,
Brent
For even more information on rephrasing the target question, you can read this article I wrote for BTG: https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2014/06/ ... t-question
- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
Ceilidh, thanks for your reply, and Brent, thanks for the questions. I have practiced all of them and they were all really good.
But i tried to work on the statement (1) of the posted question. From my working it seems to be sufficient. Please correct me if i am wrong.
Statement (1) a(b#c)=ab#ac
Case (2) subtraction
this is what i got when i put - sign here :-
ac - ad - bc + bd = bd - ad - bc + ac
Statement (1) looks sufficient.
But i tried to work on the statement (1) of the posted question. From my working it seems to be sufficient. Please correct me if i am wrong.
Statement (1) a(b#c)=ab#ac
Case (2) subtraction
Why there is + sign in the middle ? Isn't that supposed to be - (minus) here ?If # is subtraction,
(a - b)(c - d) = ac - ad - bc + bd
and
d(b - a) + c(b - a) = bd - ad + bc - ac
this is what i got when i put - sign here :-
ac - ad - bc + bd = bd - ad - bc + ac
Statement (1) looks sufficient.
Never surrender
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Sachin, I'm getting the same thing you're getting.
If # represents addition, we have
(a+b)(c+d) = d(b+a) + c(b+a)
or
ac + bc + ad + bd = bd + ad + bc + ac. This works for any {a,b,c,d}.
If # represents subtraction, we have
(a-b)(c-d) = d(b-a) - c(b-a)
or
ac - bc - ad + bd = bd - ad - bc + ac. This works for any {a,b,c,d}.
The issue with S1 is that we don't know the specific value of a that we're given in S1. For instance, if a = 0 and # = *, we would have 0(b*c) = 0*b*0*c, which is true, but which would tell us # = * and give us an answer of NO to the original question.
That said, the question is a bit ambiguous: it isn't entirely clear that S1 is a specific equation rather than a relation true over # for all {a,b,c}. Where's this question from?
If # represents addition, we have
(a+b)(c+d) = d(b+a) + c(b+a)
or
ac + bc + ad + bd = bd + ad + bc + ac. This works for any {a,b,c,d}.
If # represents subtraction, we have
(a-b)(c-d) = d(b-a) - c(b-a)
or
ac - bc - ad + bd = bd - ad - bc + ac. This works for any {a,b,c,d}.
The issue with S1 is that we don't know the specific value of a that we're given in S1. For instance, if a = 0 and # = *, we would have 0(b*c) = 0*b*0*c, which is true, but which would tell us # = * and give us an answer of NO to the original question.
That said, the question is a bit ambiguous: it isn't entirely clear that S1 is a specific equation rather than a relation true over # for all {a,b,c}. Where's this question from?