BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

historian

Expert replies
by crazy4gmat » Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:41 pm
In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler’s arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.
The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
(B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
(C) The undated document was written before 1765.
(D) The arrest record was written after the undated document.
(E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Lina » Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:28 pm
IMO Ans is E , other choices are out of scope ...
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:05 am
leaning towards E.
However I did spend some time on C.
We know he peddled for 20 yrs and also that he was arrested for peddling "without Lic" in 1939. I dint really see "without lic' and concluded, in worst case if he was arrested on day 1 of his peddling, and continued off and on for next 20yrs, he would have done till 1959. so definetly before 1965.

So not sure of E or C..

Can some one help here!!!
Join the discussion

IMO C

by ankit1383 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:33 am
IMO....C
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:50 am
it should be C

E is unsupported by question stem..
as there is no evidence of better or worst
Join the discussion

by sarika_33 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:58 am
My ans is E too .

Rest all are kind of out of scope
Join the discussion

peddling

by poseidon344 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 9:59 am
infrence-E
PLAY HARD AND WORK HARD
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Wed Dec 03, 2008 9:58 pm
vittalgmat wrote:leaning towards E.
However I did spend some time on C.
We know he peddled for 20 yrs and also that he was arrested for peddling "without Lic" in 1939. I dint really see "without lic' and concluded, in worst case if he was arrested on day 1 of his peddling, and continued off and on for next 20yrs, he would have done till 1959. so definetly before 1965.

So not sure of E or C..

Can some one help here!!!
Perfect justification for C; why you are holding E then!!!
we are not told any info, from which we can deduce which is a better evdence.
Keep flying
Join the discussion

Re: historian

by logitech » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:33 am
(C) The undated document was written before 1765> 1739+20
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:59 am
C FOR SURE
Join the discussion

by gl750raj » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:21 pm
E is the right inference. C is more ambiguous than E. So E it is.
Attitude is everything!
Join the discussion

by gl750raj » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:22 pm
E is the right inference. C is more ambiguous than E. So E it is.
Attitude is everything!
Join the discussion

by callmemo » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:37 am
Why not A?

The stimulus tells us one thing for sure, the second document should be dated later than the first one. But this doesn't necessarily conclude that the second document should be written before 1765. For instance, it could be dated much later.
Join the discussion

by shafeek » Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:50 pm
I go with E .
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:59 pm
imo C

the problem with E is, it is wayyyyyyy too close for comfort.

I'll explain:

We have 2 evidences
1) - Police Record proving that Schnitzler was peddling

2) - Schnitzler's confession that he was peddling

Now, I am not a lawyer but I think both prove that Schnitzler was peddling and are likely to hold the same weight in the court of law.

I've got to go with C as he maintains that he has been peddling for 20 years. - meaning he hasn't yet given up. My focus would be on the tense here.
Join the discussion