BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

good one

Expert replies

by uwhusky » Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:50 pm
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/not ... -t276.html

According to Stacy, we probably won't see another question that breaks the idiom.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:54 pm
kapur.arnav wrote:
uwhusky wrote:Read through the post, it does not violate the idiom "not only...but also..." It's an entirely different construction.
Ya... that question follows a different rule...

You may note the following:

Not only x... but also y.
&
not only x... but y - both are correct.....

In the following q but also at is not present in the non underlined part... hence you should just concentrate on not only x... but y

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the movements of the Sun a ... t only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not only at - is evidenced is wrong... we are measuring 2 things..
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at - correct
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only - lacks parallelism
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only - lacks parallelism
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at - to measure is wrong

Hope it helps... I'm searching for that not only x... but y construction for you... will post it for sure if im able to locate it...
Aha... found it.. here it goes... https://www.beatthegmat.com/idiom-not-on ... t9913.html..
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:59 pm
More discussion on this matter: https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/by- ... t1459.html

Good stuff btw, didn't think I was able to dig this far on what I thought was a simple idiom.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:18 pm
uwhusky wrote:More discussion on this matter: https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/by- ... t1459.html

Good stuff btw, didn't think I was able to dig this far on what I thought was a simple idiom.
Let me give you the best in this series... here it goes.. btw after this im not sure what is correct... guys can someone correctly and foronce and for all summarize this rule... this can be a pain on the day for sure...

As a result of surging economic indicators, most analysts upgraded thre company's stock to a strong "buy" ignoring the advice of the head of a watchdog organization who warned that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but ineffective in the long run.

A. who warned that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but

B. warning that the company's product would prove not only dangerous and also

C. Warning that the company's product would prove itself to be both dangerous and

D who warned that the company's product would prove to be both dangerous and

E. who was warning that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but

https://www.beatthegmat.com/economic-ind ... tml#165802
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:25 pm
Ron summarized it perfectly, and I don't think we should complicate it further unless a specific GMAT example warrants such effort.

Plus the question you just cited is not an OG question.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by vishalj » Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:19 pm
Completely agree with uwhusky. Strictly follow your idioms. And trust your source. Period.
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:59 pm
uwhusky wrote:Ron summarized it perfectly, and I don't think we should complicate it further unless a specific GMAT example warrants such effort.

Plus the question you just cited is not an OG question.
Correct... I just happened to overread Ron's Post.... He has summarized it perfectly!!!
Join the discussion

by pzazz12 » Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:04 am
kapur.arnav wrote:
uwhusky wrote:Read through the post, it does not violate the idiom "not only...but also..." It's an entirely different construction.
Ya... that question follows a different rule...

You may note the following:

Not only x... but also y.
&
not only x... but y - both are correct.....

In the following q but also at is not present in the non underlined part... hence you should just concentrate on not only x... but y

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the movements of the Sun a ... t only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not only at - is evidenced is wrong... we are measuring 2 things..
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at - correct
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only - lacks parallelism
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only - lacks parallelism
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at - to measure is wrong

Hope it helps... I'm searching for that not only x... but y construction for you... will post it for sure if im able to locate it...
thanks......for your brief explanation........
Join the discussion