BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GNP

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 25 times
by aj5105 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:27 am
The number of patents granted to inventors by the United States Patent Office dropped from 56,000 in 1971 to 45,000 in 1978. Spending on research and development, which peaked at 3 percent of the gross national product (GNP) in 1964, was only 2.2 percent of the GNP in 1978. During this period, when the United States percentage was steadily decreasing, West Germany and Japan increased the percentage of their GNP’s spent on research and development to 3.2 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively.

Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information above?

(A) There is direct relationship between the size of a nation’s GNP and the number of inventions it produces.

(B) Japan and West Germany spent more money on research and development is directly related to the number of inventions patented in that nation.

(C) The amount of money a nation spends on research and development is directly relocated to the number of inventions patented in that nation.

(D) Between 1964 and 1978 the United States consistently spent a larger percentage of its GNP on research and development than did Japan.

(E) Both West Germany and Japan will soon surpass the United States in the number of patents granted to investors.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:740

by commit.gmat » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:53 am
IMO D.

(A) There is direct relationship between the size of a nation’s GNP and the number of inventions it produces.
no information to arrive at this conclusion. We only know % of GNP. No actual figures are given.

(B) Japan and West Germany spent more money on research and development is directly related to the number of inventions patented in that nation.
Again, no information on the number of patents by Germany and Japan.

(C) The amount of money a nation spends on research and development is directly relocated to the number of inventions patented in that nation.
We don't know anything about amounts. we only know percentages.

(D) Between 1964 and 1978 the United States consistently spent a larger percentage of its GNP on research and development than did Japan.
YES. In 1964 USA spent about 3% and in 1978 that % is declined to 2.2% gradually.

In Japan's case, the % is consistently increased and in 1978 it was only 1.6% which is less than that of USA in 1978. As Japan's percentage was increasing steadily from 1964 to 1978, in 1964 it must have been much less that 1.6%.

(E) Both West Germany and Japan will soon surpass the United States in the number of patents granted to investors.
No information on the number of patents of Germany and Japan.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:27 pm

by joymukhi » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:53 am
IMO C. Please post OA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 5 times

by vinaynp » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:57 am
IMO D) Everything else is not related.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 9:16 am

by shark » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:15 pm
IMO D.

We can easily eliminate options (A), (B), and (E) for the reasons:
- there is no explicit statement connecting num of inventions and size of GNP
- there is no explicit information about Japan and Germany being granted more patents
- there is no information about G and J surpassing US

We are left with (C) and (D).

Option (C) is a strong statement. It is proposing a direct relationship between money and number of patents. This MAY be true but that is not what we are trying to do here. Can we make this conclusion from the facts specified in the paragraph. I think NO.

Option (D) is true that US spend a larger % GNP than did Japan between 65 and 78.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times

by mehravikas » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:54 pm
I ruled out 'D' because it says United States consistently had a larger percentage than Japan.

We don't have that information anywhere in the passage.

IMO - C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:740

by commit.gmat » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:03 pm
mehravikas wrote:I ruled out 'D' because it says United States consistently had a larger percentage than Japan.

We don't have that information anywhere in the passage.

IMO - C
Lets say in 1964, GNP was $100. 3% of that is 3 dollars.

So, in 1964: 3 dollars --> 56,000 patents

in 1978, GDP is $1000, 2.2% of that is 22 dollars.

1978: 22 dollars --> 45,000 patents (more amount than 1964 but less patents)

This contradicts C directly. C can be ruled out.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:57 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by gmat_dest » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:52 pm
D looks a little awkard at first , but is the best of the lot.

Steadily decreasing.... increased to... phrases confirm D.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:35 am
Location: SGP
Thanked: 5 times

by satish.nagdev » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:56 pm
mehravikas wrote: Lets say in 1964, GNP was $100. 3% of that is 3 dollars.

So, in 1964: 3 dollars --> 56,000 patents

This contradicts C directly. C can be ruled out.
there is no mention of 56000 patents in 1964 its 1971

IMO C, proportion of spending with number of patents is the key

whats OA please
Wounded by GMAT but not dead
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times

by mehravikas » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:31 am
In addition to what @satish.nagdev pointed out. How can we claim that US spent a larger percentage than Japan did?

We don't have any patents for Japan.
satish.nagdev wrote:
mehravikas wrote: Lets say in 1964, GNP was $100. 3% of that is 3 dollars.

So, in 1964: 3 dollars --> 56,000 patents

This contradicts C directly. C can be ruled out.
there is no mention of 56000 patents in 1964 its 1971

IMO C, proportion of spending with number of patents is the key

whats OA please
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:55 am
OA is D. I did this problem today in OG :D. However, my answer was wrong :(
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:27 am

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:03 pm
I will Go with option D in this case.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1