BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep Question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by f2001290 » Mon May 28, 2007 6:57 am
I will go with B.

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by hopefully » Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:21 pm
can someone explain this plz..
Join the discussion

by samirpandeyit62 » Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:29 am
Hi All,
Well this question would get a bit complicated & lengthy if we try solve it by picking up numbers & trying out various combinations like

all 4 nos +ve
all 4 -ve
a -ve, y -ve, z +ve
z =0
y = 0 etc

However a faster & better approach would be just visualise the 4 nos as 4 points on a number scale which encompasses +ve nos ,0 (origin), -ve nos

now since a < y < z < b hence whatever points you choose on the number
scale to represent these nos (-ve or +ve points or origin) , the absolute difference between the points will always remain same ,this can be visulaised as the distance between the points on the number scale. It will not matter if you shift this number system left of origin to make all values -ve, right of origin to make all +ve, or coincide pts with origin, the distance between the points will always remain the same THIS is nothing but the ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE between the points.

Now coming up to the solution

stmt 1 says |z-a| < |z-b|

now visualise this as distance between pts on the number scale,

We can say that distance between pts z & a is < distance between pts z & b

then distance between pts y & a i.e. |y-a| will be lesser than z & a as y is towards the left of z on the nos scale i.e closer to "a"
i.e. |y-a| < |z-a|

also the distance between y & b |y-a| i.e. will be greater that z & b again as y is towards the left of z, hence to travel to b from y we need to travel through z i.e travel more
hence we can say |y-b| > |z-b|

hence we can say that |y-a| < |y-b|

SO SUFF

stmt 2: says that
|y - a| < |z - b|

i.e distance between y & a is less that distance between z & b

hence we can say that distance between y & b will be greater than z & b i.e. |y-b| > |z-b| ( same reason to travel to b from y we need
to reach z first and then y)

hence sufficient

so the ans should be "D" each alone is sufficient

Pls correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks & Sorry for the lenghty explanation.
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:14 am
WOW Samir

Thats an absolutely fantastic explaination....u r a wiz!!!!
Join the discussion

by lawalx » Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:40 pm
this is crazy - sorry bou the language i jst av to say it
Join the discussion