BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep - function h(n)...

Expert replies
by steinbock » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:32 am
Got this wrong on my prep test. Can someone help?

For every positive even integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is

A) Between 2 and 10
B) Between 10 and 20
C) Between 20 and 30
D) Between 30 and 40
E) Greater than 40

OA is E
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by ksh » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:02 am
Hi steins,
here no. of even integers would be (100-2)/2 +1=50
if p is the smallest prime factor
h(100)+1=2*4*6*......100+1
so, p will be 47 which is more than 40.
answer E
Join the discussion

Re: GMATPrep - function h(n)...

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:56 pm
steinbock wrote:Got this wrong on my prep test. Can someone help?

For every positive even integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is

A) Between 2 and 10
B) Between 10 and 20
C) Between 20 and 30
D) Between 30 and 40
E) Greater than 40

OA is E
The explanation in the previous post is incorrect.

Notice that h(100) = 2*4*6*...*98*100
so h(100) = 2^50 * 50!

The point here is that h(100) is divisible by everything up to 50-- it's equal to 2^50 * 50!, and 50! is divisible by everything less than or equal to 50.

So, you can divide h(100) by any prime less than 50. That guarantees that h(100) + 1 will *not* be divisible by any prime less than 50. Try dividing it by, say, 37: h(100) is divisible by 37, so you'll get a remainder of 1 when you divide h(100) + 1 by 37, since h(100)+1 is one greater than a multiple of 37. Because of this, there's no way you can divide h(100)+1 by any prime less than 50- every time the remainder is certain to be 1.

So, what's the smallest prime divisor of h(100) + 1? That would take a very long time to work out, believe me. But we can be sure it's greater than 50.
Join the discussion

by steinbock » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:43 am
Ksh and Ian, thanks for answering. That was quite a tough one. For me atleast...
Join the discussion