BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep Exponents

Expert replies
by razorback » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:16 pm
Here I recognize that a possible concept is a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b). When I plugged the exponents into that format I got 2^1, for answer A, but was wrong! GMATPrep offers no explanations to its problems.


If xy = 1, what is the value of 2^(x+y)^2 all over 2 ^(x-y)^2

A) 2
B) 4
C) 8
D) 16
E) 32

OA: D
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by shankar.ashwin » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:24 pm
When using a^2-b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)

In this case, you have

(x+y)^2 - (x-y)^2 = (x+y+x-y)*(x+y-x+y) = 4xy.

You get 2^4xy = 2^4 = 16
Join the discussion

by rohanberi » Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:06 am
razorback wrote:Here I recognize that a possible concept is a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b). When I plugged the exponents into that format I got 2^1, for answer A, but was wrong! GMATPrep offers no explanations to its problems.


If xy = 1, what is the value of 2^(x+y)^2 all over 2 ^(x-y)^2

A) 2
B) 4
C) 8
D) 16
E) 32

OA: D
Problem says, 2^(x+y)^2 all over 2 ^(x-y)^2

Therefore, 2^(x^2 + y^2 + 2xy) all over 2^(x^2 + y^2 - 2xy)
2^(x^2 + y^2 + 2 * 1) all over 2^(x^2 + y^2 - 2 * 1) (because xy = 1)
2^(x^2 + y^2 + 2) all over 2^(x^2 + y^2 - 2)
2^(x^2 + y^2) * 2^2 all over 2^(x^2 + y^2) * 2^(-2) (Expanding)
2^2 all over 2^(-2) (2^(x^2 + y^2) got cancelled from numerator and denominator)
2^2 * 2^(2)
4 * 4
16

Hence, answer is D
Join the discussion

by chieftang » Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:37 pm
edirik wrote:Or you can just say that x=y=1 and calculate the equation in 20 seconds and find that it is 16. Snce the answer choices are all numbers, it is easy to provide those numbers such as 1 to calculate the equation.
No. If x = 1/2, y = 2, then xy = 1 and x!=y.
Join the discussion

by chieftang » Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:24 pm
edirik wrote:You are not right, I hope you really counted x = 1/2, y = 2 before you write your comment.

You can also use x = 1/2, y = 2 and see that the result is 16, as it is for x=1 and y=1.

But since we have x=1 and y=1, you do not need to select those numbers to avoid complex crunching.

Nevermind, I misunderstood what you originally said.
Join the discussion