Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT Prep

Expert replies
by agps » Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:43 am
answer is C.

from the question
let m be Mary's annual salary, j Jim's and k Kate's.
m-j=2(m-k)
m>j and m>k

from 1) j=30k, can't figure out m or k, insufficient
from 2)k=40k, can't figure out m or j, insufficient

together
we know that m>k>j
m-30=2(m-40)
m-30=2m-80
m=50
so the mean is 50+40+30/3 = 120/3 = 40, sufficient.

P.S. - you don't have to actually calculate the result, only understand that from 1 and 2 you can get m and that makes it sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jameschan168 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:37 am
Thanks agps. That's what I thought the answer should be too but the answer was B. I couldn't figure out why.
agps wrote:answer is C.

from the question
let m be Mary's annual salary, j Jim's and k Kate's.
m-j=2(m-k)
m>j and m>k

from 1) j=30k, can't figure out m or k, insufficient
from 2)k=40k, can't figure out m or j, insufficient

together
we know that m>k>j
m-30=2(m-40)
m-30=2m-80
m=50
so the mean is 50+40+30/3 = 120/3 = 40, sufficient.

P.S. - you don't have to actually calculate the result, only understand that from 1 and 2 you can get m and that makes it sufficient.
Join the discussion

by samirpandeyit62 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:01 am
Acording to Q

M - J = 2(M - K)
i.e 2k -J = M
we can use this value of M to find the avg

Now we know M =2K -J i.e. to find the avg we can substitute the value of M as 2K -J, so now we have two variables i.e J & K now conventionally we would require 2 equations to solve for 2 varibles, but this is not always true

here to find the avg we need sals of M,J,K

now M = 2K- J
sal of Jim =J
sal of Kate =K

we need to add these 3 and divide by 3 to get the avg

so lets us add these three
i.e. 2K - J + J + K
i.e 3K notice J gets Cancelled out so avg is 3k/3 =k

so avg is nothing but K's salary stnt B gives us that.

Hence ans should be B
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion

by agps » Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:38 am
good point samir. I have to be more caerefull, DS is always a trap if we don't look caerfully
Join the discussion

by samirpandeyit62 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:45 am
I also think like you do, so i always try to simplify the question stem as much as possible before looking at the statements.
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion