BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat Prep SC 1

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Gmat Prep SC 1

by iamcste » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:38 am
sparsh.21 wrote:why the option C is incorrect ?
C is passive

Also, "had included" implies that "Call" was included before "Declaration" was drafted.Incorrect

A-Passive and terribly awkward

B-"Including a call.." must modify Elizabeth..Incorrect modifier

D- That is used a non restricitve modifier

Choose E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:49 pm
@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
No rest for the Wicked....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:05 pm
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:41 pm
1: out-- sentence fragmentation when << xyz> , was a call... we require a subject

2: out : including a call, illogically modifies draft

3: out :

i have learned somewhere, pls correct me if i am wrong:
when < clause >, clause
we don't require a past perfect tense as when clause itself behaves as the past perfect form

4: sentence fragmentation

5: in
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:50 pm
iamcste wrote:
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...

declaration of sentiments:

this is some sort of a bill... or note in the parliament...
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:46 am
ronniecoleman wrote:
iamcste wrote:
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...

declaration of sentiments:

this is some sort of a bill... or note in the parliament...
It is a document just like the Declaration of Independence.
No rest for the Wicked....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:11 am

by spikeysam » Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:17 pm
But in E, isn't the "it" have multiple references? One to the Declaration, the other to the Convention?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1