BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat Prep SC 1

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: Gmat Prep SC 1

by iamcste » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:38 am
sparsh.21 wrote:why the option C is incorrect ?
C is passive

Also, "had included" implies that "Call" was included before "Declaration" was drafted.Incorrect

A-Passive and terribly awkward

B-"Including a call.." must modify Elizabeth..Incorrect modifier

D- That is used a non restricitve modifier

Choose E
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:49 pm
@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:05 pm
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:41 pm
1: out-- sentence fragmentation when << xyz> , was a call... we require a subject

2: out : including a call, illogically modifies draft

3: out :

i have learned somewhere, pls correct me if i am wrong:
when < clause >, clause
we don't require a past perfect tense as when clause itself behaves as the past perfect form

4: sentence fragmentation

5: in
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:50 pm
iamcste wrote:
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...

declaration of sentiments:

this is some sort of a bill... or note in the parliament...
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:46 am
ronniecoleman wrote:
iamcste wrote:
parallel_chase wrote:@Iamcste

I agree E is the best option available.

But I have a doubt in Option E

Declaration of sentiments that was

Shouldnt this be were instead of was

That/who always influenced by the noun preceding it without any regard for prepositional phrase.

If we change the verb in option E to were, the entire sentence goes hay wire.

What do you think. Thanks.
i agree with you...

declaration of sentiments:

this is some sort of a bill... or note in the parliament...
It is a document just like the Declaration of Independence.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by spikeysam » Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:17 pm
But in E, isn't the "it" have multiple references? One to the Declaration, the other to the Convention?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1