BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Development planners

Expert replies
by success1111 » Tue May 05, 2009 1:22 am
Development planners determined the number of new housing units needed in a certain area by using the formula H = kJ, where H is the number of new housing units needed in the area, J is the number of new jobs to be created in the area, and k is a constant. How many new housing units did the planners determine were needed?

(1) The number of new jobs to be created was 60,000.

(2) According to the formula used by the planners, if 37,500 jobs were to be created, then 7,500 new housing units would be needed
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Tue May 05, 2009 3:13 am
Statement 1:

J = 60,000. However, we don't know the value of k. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

if J = 37,500, then H = 7500. We can calculate the value of k. However, we still lack the actual number of new jobs that were created. Insufficient.

Both statements together:

we know k from statement 2 and we know J from statement 1. Hence, we can use H=kJ to solve for H. Sufficient.

Choose C.

___________________

A different way to think about this is to picture the relationship between H and J on the xy-plane. Let's say H is the y-axis and J is the x-axis. With this, you will see that H=kJ forms a straight line starting from the origin (if J=0, then H must equal 0, regardless of k) and that k is essentially the slope of this line.

In statement 1, with the value of J known, you cannot determine H unless you know the slope. In statement 2, you can construct the H=kJ line since you know a second point (37500, 7500). However, you don't know the actual number of jobs (J) that was created. From this you can conclude that both statements are required to answer the question.


-BM-
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Tue May 05, 2009 7:29 pm
bluementor wrote:Statement 1:

J = 60,000. However, we don't know the value of k. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

if J = 37,500, then H = 7500. We can calculate the value of k. However, we still lack the actual number of new jobs that were created. Insufficient.

Both statements together:

we know k from statement 2 and we know J from statement 1. Hence, we can use H=kJ to solve for H. Sufficient.

Choose C.



___________________

A different way to think about this is to picture the relationship between H and J on the xy-plane. Let's say H is the y-axis and J is the x-axis. With this, you will see that H=kJ forms a straight line starting from the origin (if J=0, then H must equal 0, regardless of k) and that k is essentially the slope of this line.

In statement 1, with the value of J known, you cannot determine H unless you know the slope. In statement 2, you can construct the H=kJ line since you know a second point (37500, 7500). However, you don't know the actual number of jobs (J) that was created. From this you can conclude that both statements are required to answer the question.


-BM-
OA is C. This is the another approach i was looking for.Thanks a lot
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion