BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep Integer Question

Expert replies
by Baldini » Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:13 am
A certain list consists of several different integers. is the product of all the integers in the list positive?

(1) the product of the greatest and the smallest integer in the list is positive
(2) there is an even number of integers in the list

I get OA E but official OA is C. Can someone please explain how to get the answer?
thanks in advance[/spoiler]
GMAX
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:47 am
The answer is obviously C.

te trick lies in the sentence product of greatest and smallest integer is positive--> so, they have to have same 'sign' and what comes in between should have same sign also.

if the list contains even numbers of integers the product has to be positive.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:58 am
cubicle_bound_misfit wrote:The answer is obviously C.

te trick lies in the sentence product of greatest and smallest integer is positive--> so, they have to have same 'sign' and what comes in between should have same sign also.

if the list contains even numbers of integers the product has to be positive.
I don't think I understand your explanation. The question does not say that the signs of the integers change alternatively or if they are consecutive integers. It simply says different numbers. So, the signs of the integers can be anything.

Statement I: Does not help because we know nothing about the integers in between the greatest & smallest integers.

Statement II: Does not help because even we know nothing about the pattern of signs for the integers. Even or odd number of integers will not help us determine if the product of all the numbers is positive or not.

Both the statements put together will also not help. If there are even number of integers (lets assume 6), and the product of the smallest & largest integers is positive, we still don't know anything about the numbers in between.
ex: -1, -2, 3, 4, 5, -6 (satisfies both the statement conditions), but gives a product value that is negative.
ex: -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 (satisfies both the statement conditions), but gives a product value that is positive.

Hence the answer should be E. Can anybody explain what I am doing wrong?
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:11 am
I posted an explanation on another occasion:

Here's how I see it:
1. tells us that (smallest)*(greatest) is positive means that:
a. both are positive and since they are the "ends" of the series, that makes all the numbers positive. In this case, the product will be positive
b. both are negative, making all of the numbers negative. However, in this case we cannot tell if the product is positive, since we don't know if we have an even or an odd "number" of numbers. Take for example: -5, -4, -3. While it's true that (-5)*(-3) is positive, that cannot be said about the product of the three.

2 doesn't help much. All numbers could be positive, or you could have smth like: -5, 3, 4, 5.

Put the two together and you "eliminate" that weak spot in case b from stmt 1: even if all numbers are negative, they "cancel" each other's minuses. So the OA is ok.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:16 am
ex: -1, -2, 3, 4, 5, -6 (satisfies both the statement conditions), but gives a product value that is negative.

Vemuri,
With the above example stmt II's condition is satisfied but not statement I's.

lowest : -6 highest: 5

The product turns out negative but it should be positive from stm I

This may have been the missing piece.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

Re: GMAT Prep Integer Question

by marcusking » Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:09 am
Baldini wrote:A certain list consists of several different integers. is the product of all the integers in the list positive?

(1) the product of the greatest and the smallest integer in the list is positive
(2) there is an even number of integers in the list

I get OA E but official OA is C. Can someone please explain how to get the answer?
thanks in advance[/spoiler]
I always approach these problems by trying to prove them insufficient so for statement 1 I will try to make it negative and positive.

1) lets take the set [-5,-3,-1] the product of -5 & -1 is positive but the product of all the numbers in the set is -15 If I add one number in the set i get [-5,-3,-2,-1] greatest and smallest (-5 & -1) has a positive integer but all numbers multiplied together is +30. There is ambiguity in the answers so immediately it's not sufficient.

2) lets try to prove this one insufficient also. lets try [-2,1] product of these numbers is -2. lets also try [2,1] this product is +2. Once again we have ambiguity so this is insufficient.

We are now down to choices E or C.

Lets try them both together
In order for both the smallest and greatest number to be positive when multiplied together both must have the same sign (+ or -) and all numbers in between must thus have the same sign.

[1,2,3,4] product of these is 24
[-1,-2,-3,-4] product of these is also 24

No matter what numbers you plug in or however many are in the set, as long as they are even and are all of the same sign the product must be positive.

C.
Join the discussion