For every positive integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all the even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is
a) between 2 and 10
b) between 10 and 20
c) between 20 and 30
d) between 30 and 40
e) greater than 40
Answer: e
I find functions quite difficult, so if you know of any good excercises or have any tips, I would be glad to hear it.
Thanks!
André
GMAT Prep - Functions
This topic has expert replies
- shovan85
- Community Manager
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:24 members
h(100) = 2*4*6*...*100
take all of the 2 common then
h(100) = (2*2*...50 times) * (1*2*3*...*50) = 2^50*(1*2*3*...*50).
Hence, all integers up to 50 are factors of h(100).
Now if h(100) + 1 is divided by any integers from 1 to 50 will have a remainder 1 as h(100) is divisible by all integers below 50.
So the least prime factor will be definitely > 50
IMO E
take all of the 2 common then
h(100) = (2*2*...50 times) * (1*2*3*...*50) = 2^50*(1*2*3*...*50).
Hence, all integers up to 50 are factors of h(100).
Now if h(100) + 1 is divided by any integers from 1 to 50 will have a remainder 1 as h(100) is divisible by all integers below 50.
So the least prime factor will be definitely > 50
IMO E
I don't really understand why 2 or 3 cannot be the smallest prime factor. Ii it because you add 1 at the end? What affect does the 1 have? Is this equation the same as the smallest prime of 100! + 1 ?shovan85 wrote:h(100) = 2*4*6*...*100
take all of the 2 common then
h(100) = (2*2*...50 times) * (1*2*3*...*50) = 2^50*(1*2*3*...*50).
Hence, all integers up to 50 are factors of h(100).
Now if h(100) + 1 is divided by any integers from 1 to 50 will have a remainder 1 as h(100) is divisible by all integers below 50.
So the least prime factor will be definitely > 50
IMO E
Thanks for your answer
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
- shovan85
- Community Manager
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:24 members
What is the question asking.... smallest prime number as the factor of h(100)+1.andre.heggli wrote:I don't really understand why 2 or 3 cannot be the smallest prime factor. Ii it because you add 1 at the end? What affect does the 1 have? Is this equation the same as the smallest prime of 100! + 1 ?shovan85 wrote:h(100) = 2*4*6*...*100
take all of the 2 common then
h(100) = (2*2*...50 times) * (1*2*3*...*50) = 2^50*(1*2*3*...*50).
Hence, all integers up to 50 are factors of h(100).
Now if h(100) + 1 is divided by any integers from 1 to 50 will have a remainder 1 as h(100) is divisible by all integers below 50.
So the least prime factor will be definitely > 50
IMO E
Thanks for your answer
What I proved (from my prev post).... from 1 to 50 (including all primes) are not a factor of h(100) +1 (as the remainder will be 1).
Now tell me if you get remainder as 1 when u divide this h(100)+1 by 2 or 3 or 7 or 11 or .... 41 are they factors of h(100) +1 .
Obviously no as whatever prime below 50 u divide with h(100)+1 you will get a remainder and so those are not factors of h(100)+1.
The addition of 1 makes the primes below 50 not divisible.
yes it is kind of same to the logic 100! + 1. Here if you see we get 50! which says all the primes below 50 is a factor of h(100) n0t (h100) +1
- goyalsau
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm
- Location: Gwalior, India
- Thanked: 31 times
Luckily i got it right,shovan85 wrote:h(100) = 2*4*6*...*100
take all of the 2 common then
h(100) = (2*2*...50 times) * (1*2*3*...*50) = 2^50*(1*2*3*...*50).
Hence, all integers up to 50 are factors of h(100).
Now if h(100) + 1 is divided by any integers from 1 to 50 will have a remainder 1 as h(100) is divisible by all integers below 50.
So the least prime factor will be definitely > 50
IMO E
Even i have taken 2 common from all the terms but that was just one 2 not 2^50.
Thanks for making the point. Clear
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Here is the rule that is being tested with this problem:andre.heggli wrote:For every positive integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all the even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is
a) between 2 and 10
b) between 10 and 20
c) between 20 and 30
d) between 30 and 40
e) greater than 40
Answer: e
I find functions quite difficult, so if you know of any good excercises or have any tips, I would be glad to hear it.
Thanks!
André
If x is a positive integer, the only factor common both to x and to x+1 is 1. They share no other factors.
Let's examine why:
If x is a multiple of 2, the next largest multiple of 2 is x+2.
If x is a multiple of 3, the next largest multiple of 3 is x+3.
Using this logic, if we go from x to x+1, we get only to the next largest multiple of 1. So 1 is the only factor common both to x and to x+1. They share no other factors.
Thus, in the problem above, we know that 1 is the only factor common both to h(100) and to h(100) + 1. They share no other factors.
h(100) = 2 * 4 * 6 *....* 94 * 96 * 98 * 100
Factoring out 2, we get:
h(100) = 2^50 (1 * 2 * 3 *... * 47 * 48 * 49 * 50)
Looking at the set of parentheses on the right, we can see that every prime number between 1 and 50 is a factor of h(100). This means that NONE of the prime numbers between 1 and 50 is a factor of h(100) + 1, because h(100) and h(100) + 1 share no factors other than 1.
So the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1 must be greater than 50.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3