BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep - Fullerenes

Expert replies
by TGE » Sun May 17, 2009 4:06 pm
All,

Please see the question below:

Although fullerenes – spherical molecules made entirely of carbon – were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth’s crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
(B) Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
(C) The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed
(D) The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure
(E) Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.

[spoiler]OA: D

I was able to get to the correct answer by process of elimination, but I'm still sitting on the fence on answer choice D. It seems like the other ACs (A, B, C and E) are irrelevant, so D must be the answer, but how exactly does D undermine the argument? If anyone can shed light on this, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by myohmy » Sun May 17, 2009 4:41 pm
I would say that D undermines the argument because the author is arguing that the discovery of naturally occurring fullerenes will give us a test case for evaluating hypotheses on the state of the earth's crust when the naturally occurring fullerenes formed...

HOWEVER, if the fullerenes that formed naturally are substantially different ("previously unknown crystalline structure") from the lab-created fullerenes, then they likely were created under circumstances somewhat different than the ones the lab used to create the fullerenes, therefore, we can't hypothesize as to the earth's crust at the time of their formation.
Join the discussion

by krishnakumarhod » Sun May 17, 2009 5:16 pm
my opinion

If the shingite is formed from an unknown crystalline structure of carbon.We need to know what kind of environment led to the formation of that carbon

in lab

carbon type X --> high temp and pressure --> fullerness

In nature

carbon type Y(unknown structure)-->(wat happned??)-->fullerness

hope the above is helpfull
Join the discussion

by TGE » Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 am
This is great. Thanks, guys.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sat May 23, 2009 6:04 am
IMO is B

the material is created in different environment so we can not know the state of Earth's crust and B destroy conclusion.
Join the discussion

by mbadrew » Sat May 23, 2009 4:42 pm
duongthang wrote:IMO is B

the material is created in different environment so we can not know the state of Earth's crust and B destroy conclusion.
B--goes outside the context of the discussion. Keep in mind, the discussion is about comparison of lab material Vs. natural material. Is it the same? Can lab synthesized material be used to determine the earth's crustal composition.

D--weakens the arguement because you're comparing lab created material with natural material that has a different chemical composition.
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:40 am
myohmy wrote:I would say that D undermines the argument because the author is arguing that the discovery of naturally occurring fullerenes will give us a test case for evaluating hypotheses on the state of the earth's crust when the naturally occurring fullerenes formed...

HOWEVER, if the fullerenes that formed naturally are substantially different ("previously unknown crystalline structure") from the lab-created fullerenes, then they likely were created under circumstances somewhat different than the ones the lab used to create the fullerenes, therefore, we can't hypothesize as to the earth's crust at the time of their formation.
Great explanation!
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:56 am
Hi,

I discussed this question in some depth over here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-fu ... tml#201811
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion