BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP DS

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by chatekar » Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:28 am
From statement [1]

x > 0, now y can be positive or negative,

assume y is positive, then (x-y) < (x+y) ==> (x-y)/(x+y) < 1
assume y is negative, then (x-y) > (x+y) ==> (x-y)/(x+y) > 1

Hence statement [1] alone is not sufficient.


From statement[2]

Following the above logic for y, we get the 2 different results and hence statement [2] alone is not sufficient.

Considering statement [1] and [2] together, we get a unique answer, so statement [1] and [2] together are sufficient to solve the problem

Whats the OA?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by sykedaddy » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:06 am
I had the same thought process but the OA is E...not sure why
No WAMMYs!!
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:17 am
(x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

(1) x>0
(2) y<0

x = 1/4
y = -1/2
x-y = 1/4 - (-1/2) = 3/4
x+y = 1/4 - 1/2 = -1/2
(x-y)/(x+y) = 3/4 / -1/2 = -3/2 (<1)

x = 4
y = -2
x-y = 6
x+y = 2
6/2 = 3 (>1)

NOT SUFFICIENT. Hence E.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by bingojohn » Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:21 am
givemeanid wrote:(x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

(1) x>0
(2) y<0

x = 1/4
y = -1/2
x-y = 1/4 - (-1/2) = 3/4
x+y = 1/4 - 1/2 = -1/2
(x-y)/(x+y) = 3/4 / -1/2 = -3/2 (<1)

x = 4
y = -2
x-y = 6
x+y = 2
6/2 = 3 (>1)

NOT SUFFICIENT. Hence E.
I don't understand, the answer should be (B). Here is my thinking:

x-y/x+y > 1 ?
... x-y > x+y ?
... x-x > y+y ?
... 2y < 0 ?
... y < 0 ? must be answered, for the original question to be answered.

Choice (1) doesn't answer this, (2) does. Hence (B). \

Correct me if I am wrong, please.
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:59 am
x-y/x+y > 1 ?
... x-y > x+y ?
If m/n > 1, it does not mean m > n. You DO NOT know whether n is +ve or -ve.

Remember, if you multiply (or divide) both sides of the inequality by a negative number, the sign of inequality reverses.

In this case. you do not know whether x+y is +ve or -ve. So, you cannot multiply both sides by (x+y).
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by bingojohn » Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:15 am
givemeanid wrote:
x-y/x+y > 1 ?
... x-y > x+y ?
If m/n > 1, it does not mean m > n. You DO NOT know whether n is +ve or -ve.

Remember, if you multiply (or divide) both sides of the inequality by a negative number, the sign of inequality reverses.

In this case. you do not know whether x+y is +ve or -ve. So, you cannot multiply both sides by (x+y).
Oops, my bad... I guess I better brush up my inequalities...

Thanks a lot givemeanid...
Join the discussion

by sochatte » Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:22 am
How about this?

x-y/x+y > 1 = x-y/x+y -1 > 0 = -2y/x+y > 0
so the question would be
is -2y/x+y > 0

1. x > 0
we don't know anything about y so NS

2. y < 0
we don't know anything about x , so NS

1 & 2 . if y is -ve, -2y will be +ve, however x+y can be +ve or -ve depending on the values of x and y. hence NS

Ans is E
Join the discussion