If ax + b = 0, is x > 0?
a. a+b > 0
b. a-b > 0
I thought the answer was B, but OA is E.
My approach: ax = -b, so either a > 0 and x < 0 or a <0 and x > 0.
If a-b> 0, a>b, which means that a is positive and x is negative.
Please explain. Thanks!
GMAT Prep - DS Inequalities
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:53 am
- Thanked: 1 times
If ax + b = 0, is x > 0?
a. a+b > 0
b. a-b > 0
Oks, Ans is E
In your solution, make sure you consider the case a=2(positive) and b=-1 (negative)when evaluating a-b>0
a. a+b > 0
b. a-b > 0
Oks, Ans is E
In your solution, make sure you consider the case a=2(positive) and b=-1 (negative)when evaluating a-b>0
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:2 members
ax + b = 0oks wrote:If ax + b = 0, is x > 0?
a. a+b > 0
b. a-b > 0
ax = -b
x > 0 ?? or is x = positive
Statement I
a+b > 0
a - ax > 0
a( 1-x) > 0
either a & (1-x) both positive or both negative.
x could be positive or negative
Insufficient.
Statement II
a-b > 0
a+ax > 0
a (1+x) > 0
either a & (1+x) both positive or both negative.
x could be either negative or positive
Insufficient.
Combining I & II
We only know that x could be positive or negative.
Hence E.
Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:4 members
Got E..
procedure is similar to parallel_chase. Let me add a little more detail.
from the stem
ax = -b OR b = -ax
stmt 1:
a+b > 0
=> a -ax > 0
=> a(1 -x) > 0
=> either a is +ve OR (1 -x) is +ve
=> ie 1 -x > 0 => x < 1. X could be +ve (values 0 and 1. maybe decimals) OR -ve (x can take any value < 1...)
So Not sufficient.
stmt2:
a -b >0
a - (ax) > 0
a(1 +x) > 0
a +ve OR 1 +x is +ve
1 +x > 0 => x > -1
Again X could be +ve or -ve.
Combining the two.
Here we have 2 possibilities.
1) a is +ve. Then we dont know anything about x. so not sufficient.
2) x > -1 and x < 1. There could be an infinite decimal numbers between these two values; some are +ve and some are -ve.
So insufficient as well.
From both cases we cant determine x +ve or -ve.
so E
HT Helps
procedure is similar to parallel_chase. Let me add a little more detail.
from the stem
ax = -b OR b = -ax
stmt 1:
a+b > 0
=> a -ax > 0
=> a(1 -x) > 0
=> either a is +ve OR (1 -x) is +ve
=> ie 1 -x > 0 => x < 1. X could be +ve (values 0 and 1. maybe decimals) OR -ve (x can take any value < 1...)
So Not sufficient.
stmt2:
a -b >0
a - (ax) > 0
a(1 +x) > 0
a +ve OR 1 +x is +ve
1 +x > 0 => x > -1
Again X could be +ve or -ve.
Combining the two.
Here we have 2 possibilities.
1) a is +ve. Then we dont know anything about x. so not sufficient.
2) x > -1 and x < 1. There could be an infinite decimal numbers between these two values; some are +ve and some are -ve.
So insufficient as well.
From both cases we cant determine x +ve or -ve.
so E
HT Helps
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
from stem x = -b/a
so one needs to determine whether a n b are of opposite sign, as that is the only way to make x positive...
from 1. a+b>0 a n b can be choosen not to satisfy req i.e a = 3 b =2 x-ve
a = 3 b = -1 x +ve
from 2. a-b >0 => a>b so still a = 3 b = 2 holds true x -ve
a=3 b=-1 x +ve
combine also doesnt help as for a = 3 b=2 x -ve
a = 3 b = -1 x +ve
so one needs to determine whether a n b are of opposite sign, as that is the only way to make x positive...
from 1. a+b>0 a n b can be choosen not to satisfy req i.e a = 3 b =2 x-ve
a = 3 b = -1 x +ve
from 2. a-b >0 => a>b so still a = 3 b = 2 holds true x -ve
a=3 b=-1 x +ve
combine also doesnt help as for a = 3 b=2 x -ve
a = 3 b = -1 x +ve