BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.
with Chris Peckover
with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
btgyes wrote:Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
but this is why am convinced that C doesn't provide any evidence that OXYGEN IS OF NO HELP...as two (Oxygen and Lungs) are different things..!
Bold statement provide that evidence but C doesn't. This is why i am not convinced about C.
(i didn't find even D convincing but had to make guess during test)
ta...
Oxygen is absorbed by LUNGS or by any other parts of body , it is useful as per argument.maihuna wrote:Ohh it negates because, as per this argument, oxygen that can help build muscles can only be absorbed through lungs, while the water brand being advertised is for drinking, since argument says *only lungs* can help build muscles, drinking water will not help, and so it weaken the argument that OXYRiCH is of any help.btgyes wrote:Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
but this is why am convinced that C doesn't provide any evidence that OXYGEN IS OF NO HELP...as two (Oxygen and Lungs) are different things..!
Bold statement provide that evidence but C doesn't. This is why i am not convinced about C.
(i didn't find even D convincing but had to make guess during test)
ta...
btgyes wrote:Oxygen is absorbed by LUNGS or by any other parts of body , it is useful as per argument.maihuna wrote:Ohh it negates because, as per this argument, oxygen that can help build muscles can only be absorbed through lungs, while the water brand being advertised is for drinking, since argument says *only lungs* can help build muscles, drinking water will not help, and so it weaken the argument that OXYRiCH is of any help.btgyes wrote:Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
but this is why am convinced that C doesn't provide any evidence that OXYGEN IS OF NO HELP...as two (Oxygen and Lungs) are different things..!
Bold statement provide that evidence but C doesn't. This is why i am not convinced about C.
(i didn't find even D convincing but had to make guess during test)
ta...
whereas BOLD statement gives evidence that there is no use of oxygen at all.
C statement gives idea that somehow oxygen is USEFUL for body.
that's why C is not good.
i do not know what am missing in that.
ta
Mate,maihuna wrote:Oxygen absorbed by body is a different fact than oxygen absorbed by body through the help of OXYRICH mineral water. Have you got this fact right? If not repeat this sentence 10 times. Then read further.
Since the option C says *only* note *only* way oxygen can help build muscle is through LUNGS. and LUNGS doesn't absorb water, in fact when LUNGS absorb water it is some sort of medical ailment. This weaken the advertizer that OXYRICH water can help build muscle, the argument is about weakening OXYRICH advertizements and not OXYGEN.
btgyes wrote:Oxygen is absorbed by LUNGS or by any other parts of body , it is useful as per argument.maihuna wrote:Ohh it negates because, as per this argument, oxygen that can help build muscles can only be absorbed through lungs, while the water brand being advertised is for drinking, since argument says *only lungs* can help build muscles, drinking water will not help, and so it weaken the argument that OXYRiCH is of any help.btgyes wrote:Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
but this is why am convinced that C doesn't provide any evidence that OXYGEN IS OF NO HELP...as two (Oxygen and Lungs) are different things..!
Bold statement provide that evidence but C doesn't. This is why i am not convinced about C.
(i didn't find even D convincing but had to make guess during test)
ta...
whereas BOLD statement gives evidence that there is no use of oxygen at all.
C statement gives idea that somehow oxygen is USEFUL for body.
that's why C is not good.
i do not know what am missing in that.
ta
btgyes wrote:Mate,maihuna wrote:Oxygen absorbed by body is a different fact than oxygen absorbed by body through the help of OXYRICH mineral water. Have you got this fact right? If not repeat this sentence 10 times. Then read further.
Since the option C says *only* note *only* way oxygen can help build muscle is through LUNGS. and LUNGS doesn't absorb water, in fact when LUNGS absorb water it is some sort of medical ailment. This weaken the advertizer that OXYRICH water can help build muscle, the argument is about weakening OXYRICH advertizements and not OXYGEN.
btgyes wrote:Oxygen is absorbed by LUNGS or by any other parts of body , it is useful as per argument.maihuna wrote:Ohh it negates because, as per this argument, oxygen that can help build muscles can only be absorbed through lungs, while the water brand being advertised is for drinking, since argument says *only lungs* can help build muscles, drinking water will not help, and so it weaken the argument that OXYRiCH is of any help.btgyes wrote:Yes.. Exactly...!maihuna wrote:This question requires what the underlying portion is doing, and then choose an option that does the same. On re-read the bold argument is providing a reason suggesting why more oxygen is of no help. The same is convyed in C, the credited response, where it says that only way to absorb oxygen is through LUNGS, and are allowedto use this outside knowledge that drinking and LUNG are two different thing, if oxygen is only absorbed through LUNGS drinking will not help
WHy D is not a correct option, because, it only says there can be other ways to improve performance, since the argument is about oxygen, it doesn't help negate that oxyrich is of no help.
but this is why am convinced that C doesn't provide any evidence that OXYGEN IS OF NO HELP...as two (Oxygen and Lungs) are different things..!
Bold statement provide that evidence but C doesn't. This is why i am not convinced about C.
(i didn't find even D convincing but had to make guess during test)
ta...
whereas BOLD statement gives evidence that there is no use of oxygen at all.
C statement gives idea that somehow oxygen is USEFUL for body.
that's why C is not good.
i do not know what am missing in that.
ta
I think i got yr point...
but one ques...
it is yr EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE that lungs are not supposed to absorb water, it they do that means there is some malfunctioning.
Acc to you, does GMAC expect us to know medical things...
at least in my case, i don't have a bit of idea what LUNGS, LIVER or PANCREAS are supposed to do...
a person who don't know this external knowledge will find that somehow C statement is helpful in making muscle.....
But anyway, Thanks.... i got yr idea.. and of course C is Right...!
New here Create free account
