BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep / Absolute Value

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by earth@work » Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:32 pm
IMO : C
(1) x+y=z - insufficient, plugging values x=4,y=2,z=6,we get 4+2=6
absolute value(4)=4=6-2....correct,
but if we take x<0 ,say x=-4, y=2,z=-2,we get -4+2=-2
Absolute value of(-4) = 4 = -2-2=-4...incorrect
(2) gives us x<0, which is the case 2 of explanation above. this is not sufficient alone but sufficient when (1) &(2) are taken together.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:46 pm
Earth@work u r right about C) but may be not on the values picked

Stmt I
but if we take x<0 ,say x=-4, y=2,z=-2,we get -4+2=-2
Absolute value of(-4) = 4 = -2-2=-4...incorrect
|-4|= 4 y-z = 2-(-2) = 4 so |x| = y-z

x=1 y=2 z=3

|X| = 1 but y-z = -1 so |x| <> y-z

INSUFF

Stmt II

x<0

x=-10 y=-100 z=-1000

|x| <> y-z

x=-1 y=2 z=1

|x| = y-z

INSUFF


Stmt I and II together

X+Y = Z
X<0

Take y negative(y>z) or positive(y>z) |x| = y-z

C)
Join the discussion

by raajan_p » Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Folks,

I was thinking in entirely different way for this question..

Can anyone let me know the issue with my approach...

Question asked: Is |x| = Y - Z

this can be re-written as X = Y - Z and X = Z - Y or 2Z = 2Y

or Question asked can be re-written as is Z = Y?

From 1, we know that X + Y = Z ; we dont know the individual values...If X = 0, then Y = Z..if not, then Y != Z...So option A not sufficient..

From 2, we can derive nothing about Y and Z...

Combining both 1 and 2, since we know that X < 0, Y cannot be equal to Z...

So C is the answer.
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:44 pm
I am taking little different approach, would appreciate if anyone can let me know any issue with this approach ?

Question stem
Is |x| = y-z
==> we need to check
if y-z = +ve
From Statement 1
x+y = z ==> y - z = -x
thus y-z will be +ve if x is -ve hence insuff.

From Statement 2:
x<0 again insufficient

From 1 and 2 we get x<0
hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:55 pm
Looks good to me Amit! Nice work.
Join the discussion