This is a critical reasoning question from Kaplan.
All German Philosophers, except for Marx, are idealists.
From which of the following can the statement above be most properly inferred?
A. Except for Marx, if someone is an idealist philosopher, then he or she is German.
B. Marx is the only non-German philosopher who is an idealist.
C. If a German is an idealist, then he or she is a philosopher, as long as he or she is not Marx.
D. Marx is not an idealist German philosopher
E. Aside from the philosopher Marx, if someone is a German philosopher, then he or she is an idealist.
Ans : E, but why not D
German Philosophers
This topic has expert replies
gmatrant:
It's not D, because D is just the premise worded differently.
I initially was thinking the same when I did the problem, but in CR's if the premise is part of the solution, it's usually worded differently and is always the wrong answer.
It's not D, because D is just the premise worded differently.
I initially was thinking the same when I did the problem, but in CR's if the premise is part of the solution, it's usually worded differently and is always the wrong answer.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 2 times
Sorry assumed you got the question directly from the Kaplan GMAT Book (this question is part of the 50 practice questions after the CR review). I can type up the Kaplan reasoning if you don't have the book tonight when I get home.gmatrant wrote:sorry i did not understand your reply....
start from here as in??
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 2 times
From the Kaplan book:
"Read carefully! You're asked to pick the choice from which the statment can be derived, and that's (E): If, as (E) says, anyone who is a German philosopher is an idealist except for the philosopher Marx, then all German philosophers except for Marx are idealist. That being the case, it would certaily be true that, as the stimulus says, with the exception of Marx, all German philosophers - the folks being a subset of all Germans - are idealists. Now while (E)'s claim that all German philosophers are idealists may sound a bit absurd to you (perhaps you know some German philosophers who aren't idealists), we're concerned with strict logic here, not content.
(A) tells us that except for Marx, if someone's an idealist philosopher, then he or she is German, which is precisely the opposite of what we need: Knowing that all idealist philosophers (except Marx) are German doesn't prove that all German philosophers are idealists, because there could be other kinds of German philosophers. Since the stimulus statement tells us that Marx is a German philosopher who's not an idealist, (B), which contradicts this, is wrong. (C) lets us conclude that German idealists who aren't Marx are philosophers, but we need to conclude that German philosophers (except Marx) are idealists. As for (D), like the stimulus statement, it tells us that Marx isn't an idealist German philosopher, but we need a statement that ensures that every other German philosopher besides Marx is an idealist."
Whew!! Hope that helps.
"Read carefully! You're asked to pick the choice from which the statment can be derived, and that's (E): If, as (E) says, anyone who is a German philosopher is an idealist except for the philosopher Marx, then all German philosophers except for Marx are idealist. That being the case, it would certaily be true that, as the stimulus says, with the exception of Marx, all German philosophers - the folks being a subset of all Germans - are idealists. Now while (E)'s claim that all German philosophers are idealists may sound a bit absurd to you (perhaps you know some German philosophers who aren't idealists), we're concerned with strict logic here, not content.
(A) tells us that except for Marx, if someone's an idealist philosopher, then he or she is German, which is precisely the opposite of what we need: Knowing that all idealist philosophers (except Marx) are German doesn't prove that all German philosophers are idealists, because there could be other kinds of German philosophers. Since the stimulus statement tells us that Marx is a German philosopher who's not an idealist, (B), which contradicts this, is wrong. (C) lets us conclude that German idealists who aren't Marx are philosophers, but we need to conclude that German philosophers (except Marx) are idealists. As for (D), like the stimulus statement, it tells us that Marx isn't an idealist German philosopher, but we need a statement that ensures that every other German philosopher besides Marx is an idealist."
Whew!! Hope that helps.
- tendays2go
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 6:51 am
- Location: Netherlands
- Thanked: 10 times
- GMAT Score:680
@ wonder.
Venn diagram for CR, brilliant!
it solves the problem with minimum reasons required to be given.
a highly effective alternate way!
Venn diagram for CR, brilliant!
it solves the problem with minimum reasons required to be given.
a highly effective alternate way!
- VP_Tatiana
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:55 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:750+
I just want to caution everyone about using Venn diagrams for CR questions. Venn diagrams are great for overlapping sets Quant questions, but they can be misleading as far as CR questions go.
The main reason is that the word SOME could mean 1 or it could mean ALL. So, the Venn diagram for "Some A's are B's" could have a very small overlapping area, or it could be two entirely overlapping circles!
If you draw "Some A's are B's" to just have a small overlapping area, and then you are asked if some A's are not B's, you may incorrectly answer "Yes!"
Again, because the two sets may be entirely overlapping, we cannot say with certainty that there exist A's that are not B's.
I hope that helps. We recommend using line diagrams for CR problems (ie some A -> B) as they avoid this pitfall.
Tatiana
The main reason is that the word SOME could mean 1 or it could mean ALL. So, the Venn diagram for "Some A's are B's" could have a very small overlapping area, or it could be two entirely overlapping circles!
If you draw "Some A's are B's" to just have a small overlapping area, and then you are asked if some A's are not B's, you may incorrectly answer "Yes!"
Again, because the two sets may be entirely overlapping, we cannot say with certainty that there exist A's that are not B's.
I hope that helps. We recommend using line diagrams for CR problems (ie some A -> B) as they avoid this pitfall.
Tatiana
Tatiana Becker | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:26 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Thanked: 6 times
I'm with ya on the line diagrams.. Venn diagrams - never thought of using those for CR questions .. but like u said there could be overlapping issues with 'some .. not all .. ' questions. I just use a crude line diagrams .. didn't know that it was a noted technique Thanks.VP_Tatiana wrote:I just want to caution everyone about using Venn diagrams for CR questions. Venn diagrams are great for overlapping sets Quant questions, but they can be misleading as far as CR questions go.
The main reason is that the word SOME could mean 1 or it could mean ALL. So, the Venn diagram for "Some A's are B's" could have a very small overlapping area, or it could be two entirely overlapping circles!
If you draw "Some A's are B's" to just have a small overlapping area, and then you are asked if some A's are not B's, you may incorrectly answer "Yes!"
Again, because the two sets may be entirely overlapping, we cannot say with certainty that there exist A's that are not B's.
I hope that helps. We recommend using line diagrams for CR problems (ie some A -> B) as they avoid this pitfall.
Tatiana
- pradeep
- arora007
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 51 times
- Followed by:27 members
- GMAT Score:670
this was really an amazing one! clever trap!!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!