Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Geometry

Expert replies
by molt_llest » Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:15 am
I thought this was pretty easy but I'm doing something wrong.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kishore » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:03 pm
Answer: C

A(S) = 2 A(s)

= 2 *( 1/2 * s * h) ( area = 1/2 * base * height)

A(S) = 1/2 * S * H


From above, we can conclude that if S = sqrt(2) * s and H = sqrt(2) *h
then the A(S) = 2 A(s)

There fore S = sqrt(2) * s
Join the discussion

by jasonc » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:11 pm
the area is twice as large does not mean the length of the sides are twice as long.

what is given is the following:
similar triangles = proportions of sides on the two triangles are equal
i.e. b/B=s/S=any side of the smaller triangle/the same side of the larger triangle

area of big = 2x area of small => (1/2*s*b)*2 = 1/2*S*B
=>s*b=1/2*S*B
=>2*s*b/B=S
=>2*s*(s/S)=S
=>2s^2=S^2
=>S = SQRT(2)*s
I beat the GMAT! 760 (Q49/V44)
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:21 pm
How can you use the side proportionality to replace the height?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:42 am
The key fact to remember to answer this question quickly is that area is a square function and length is a linear function.

We have similar triangles, which means that one is simply a bigger copy of the other; in other words, everything is proportional from one triangle to the next.

If we were told that the bigger triangle had LENGTHS twice the size of the smaller, then the area of the larger (since it's a square function) would simply be 2^2 = 4 times as big. If the bigger had lengths three times the size of the smaller, then the area of the larger would be 3^2 = 9 times as big.

However, we're not going from length to area, we're going from area to length... so instead of squaring, we need to square root.

So, if the area is twice as big, then each linear dimension will be sqrt2 as big: choose (sqrt2)s.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:07 am
Stuart,

Are you saying that the height of the larger triangle is also double the height of the smaller triangle, because its side is twice the side of the smaller triangle?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:12 pm
chidcguy wrote:Stuart,

Are you saying that the height of the larger triangle is also double the height of the smaller triangle, because its side is twice the side of the smaller triangle?
First, it's side is NOT twice the side of the smaller triangle.. it's side is sqrt2 * the side of the smaller triangle.

And yes, the height of the larger triangle is also sqrt2 * the height of the smaller triangle.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:41 pm
Thanks Stuart.

How can we say that the height of similar triangles are also proportional? AFAIK, all the material I have looked at (Kaplan,MGMAT) only pointed out that angles are equal and all the sides are in same proportion. If its mandatory that the heights of similar triangles are in same proportion as the sides are, why did every one miss this?

I looked for mathematical theorem or proof that says similar triangles have same height. I could not find any
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:18 pm
IMO this is how it goes...

First,as look at the problem,we get to know the triangles are similar triangles.

For similar triangles -- square of the ratio of the sides = Ratio of the area of the triangles.

(s/S)^2 = As/AS

Now it's been given in the problem that AS=2As

Substitute-- we get s^2/S^2=1/2
Cross multiple-- 2s^2 = S^2
Therefore S = sqrt2 s
Join the discussion

by canuckclint » Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:33 pm
chidcguy wrote:Thanks Stuart.

How can we say that the height of similar triangles are also proportional? AFAIK, all the material I have looked at (Kaplan,MGMAT) only pointed out that angles are equal and all the sides are in same proportion. If its mandatory that the heights of similar triangles are in same proportion as the sides are, why did every one miss this?

I looked for mathematical theorem or proof that says similar triangles have same height. I could not find any
This one is easy to prove mathematically:

Take triangle 1 and 2 to have angle x and 90degree angle
Then we know for smaller triangle

tan(x) = h div s
For bigger triangle
tan(x) = H div S
Equate the two equations:
h div s = H div S
Height to side ratios are proportional.

z

x 90

Clinton
Math Minor
Join the discussion