BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Geometry Problem - GMATPREP

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by persevering » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:51 pm
Statements (1) and (2) yield the exact same information; that
m=3b (where y = mx + b)

So (e)
Join the discussion

clarification

by gmatrant » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:42 pm
persevering wrote:Statements (1) and (2) yield the exact same information; that
m=3b (where y = mx + b)

So (e)
Persevering ..thanks for the explanations, but I would like to understand a bit more on this problem

1. The slope of line l is 3 times its y intercept
What does this mean mathematically in an equation of line y=mx+b
y intercept is b isnt it?(putting x as 0). So does this mean m = 3b?

2.x intercept of line l is -1/3.
Does this mean -b/m = -1/3 ?

Secondly I would like to know if given the equation of a line y = 2x+3,
is this how we calculate x intercept and y intercept
y/a + x/b =1 so
y -2x = 3
=> y/3 -2x/3 =1
=> y/3 -x/(3/2) =1
=> y/3+x(-3/2) =1
so y intercept is 3
x intercept is -3/2
Am I right?
Join the discussion

by raulverde » Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:10 am
I would like to know the solution to this one too.

Calling all experts....pandey ji where are you ?
Join the discussion

by enlightenment » Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:35 pm
statement 1 gives you the slope of line l is 3 times its y-intercept. Knowing this fact on it's own is insufficient to finding the slope of the line, as we have no reference point. Furthermore, if line l crosses above or below the x-axis that will affect the slope making it positive or negative, depending on the reference point, which we do not have. Therefore, statement 1 is insufficient.

statement 2 gives the x-intercept but gives no hint as to how the line proceeds through that point. Going through (-1/3,0) the line could cross the y-intercept anywhere from +infinity to -infinity. Therefore insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 taken together look like they may solve the answer. From statement 2 we know the x intercept (-1/3,0). However, does line l pass through th y-intercept at (0, 1) or (0, -1)? Both of these points would fulfill statements 1 and 2 together, there for statements 1 and 2 taken together are NOT sufficient. (E)
Join the discussion

Re: clarification

by gabriel » Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:28 am
gmatrant wrote:
.....Secondly I would like to know if given the equation of a line y = 2x+3,
is this how we calculate x intercept and y intercept
y/a + x/b =1 so
y -2x = 3
=> y/3 -2x/3 =1
=> y/3 -x/(3/2) =1
=> y/3+x(-3/2) =1
so y intercept is 3
x intercept is -3/2
Am I right?
The x intercept of the line is the intercept the line makes on the X axis when it is extended to the X axis, now we know that for every point on the X axis the Y coordinate is 0 ... So, for any line (eg y = 2x+3), to find the X intercept substitute y = 0 .. so if u substitute y =0 in y =2x+3 we get the x intercept of the line as -3/2 ..

Similarly if you want to find the Y intercept of the line substitute x =0 in the equation of the line, if you do that in the above equation we have Y intercept of line = 3 ..

Regards.
Join the discussion