BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Fundraising Fees

Expert replies
by actofman » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:03 am
Each person attending a fund-raising party for a certain club was charged the same admission fee. How many people attended the party?
a) If the admission fee had been $0.75 less and 100 more people had attended, the club would have received the same amount in admission fees.
b) If the admission fee had been $1.50 more and 100 fewer people had attended, the club would have received the same amount in admission fees.

I thought each would be sufficient assuming X is attendees while $1.00 is sample fee. Should I be equating the 2?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anju@Gurome » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:20 am
actofman wrote:Each person attending a fund-raising party for a certain club was charged the same admission fee. How many people attended the party?

a) If the admission fee had been $0.75 less and 100 more people had attended, the club would have received the same amount in admission fees.
b) If the admission fee had been $1.50 more and 100 fewer people had attended, the club would have received the same amount in admission fees.
Say, the admission fee was $F and N people attended the party.
Hence, total amount of admission fee received = $FN

Statement 1: (F - 0.75)(N + 100) = FN ---> (0.75N + 100F + 75) = 0
We can't solve for N without any extra information.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: (F + 1.50)(N - 100) = FN ---> (1.5N - 100F - 150) = 0
We can't solve for N without any extra information.

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: Now we have two different equations in two unknowns. Hence, we can solve for both N and F.

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Last edited by Anju@Gurome on Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by hemant_rajput » Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:44 am
Anju@Gurome wrote:
Statement 1: (F + 0.75)(N + 100) = FN
shouldn't it be like this ?

(F - 0.75)(N + 100) = FN
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by Anju@Gurome » Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:22 am
hemant_rajput wrote:shouldn't it be like this ?

(F - 0.75)(N + 100) = FN
Yes. I made a typing mistake.
Edited my reply.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by thang » Wed Apr 29, 2015 1:46 am
the problem is that we have to prove two equation are different, not the same. very simple, they are not the same
but for some other questions, two equations are the same and the answer is E.

becareful
looking for the girl living in Bradford UK, visiting Halong bay, Vietnam on 26- 27 Jan 2014. all persons, pls, forward this message to all persons you know to help me find her: my email: [email protected], call: 84904812758
Join the discussion