BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

For most people, the left half of the brain controls linguis

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorAT » Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:28 pm
For most people, the left half of the brain controls linguistic capabilities, but some people have their language centers in the right half. When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way. Therefore, people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment must have their language centers in the right half.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the reasoning in the argument above depends?

A. No part of a person’s brain that is damaged by a stroke ever recovers.
B. Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.
C. Strokes tend to impair linguistic capabilities more severely than does any other cause of damage to language centers in the brain.
D. If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, any serious stroke affecting that side of the brain damages at least one of them.
E. It is impossible to determine which side of the brain contains a person’s language centers if the person has not suffered damage to either side of the brain.

What's the best approach to determine the answer?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Vincen » Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:41 pm
This is a really interesting question. I'd love to get an explantion of how can I solve this CR question. Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by EconomistGMATTutor » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:04 am
The conclusion: People who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering linguistic impairment must have their language centers in the right half.

Evidence: 1) The left (usually) or right half of the brain controls linguistic capabilities.
2) When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way.

Assumption: Having a serious stroke will impair language centers. If this is NOT true, if a person can have a serious stroke without damage being done to language centers in the brain, then the conclusion is not justified. People with language centers on the left half could then have a serious stroke on the left side without suffering any language impairment. Again, the assumption is that strokes invariably damage language centers, as Choice D says.

Choice A need not be assumed. It might be that some parts, or all parts, are damaged and will never recover. This doesn't affect the argument.
Choice B doesn't have to be assumed. Other causes of linguistic impairment are irrelevant.
Choice C makes an irrelevant comparison.
Choice E might be true, might not be true . . . it doesn't matter.

I'm available if you'd like any follow up.
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Join the discussion

by meenakshimiyer » Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:46 pm
A. This statement holds no relevance to the conclusion made in the argument.
B. Here we are talking about the impairment caused by damage to language centers of the brain and we have derived a conclusion base on that only. Linguistic impairment caused by other reasons than damage to linguistic centers is not the concern.
C. We are not supposed to compare impairment caused by strokes or any other damage.
D. This is the assumption made in the argument. If we negate this statement and say that a serious stroke affecting the side of brain which consists the linguistic centre doesn't damage it then the whole conclusion would be wrong. So, it must be assumed that stroke would damage the part of brain. Hence, D is the answer.
E. The conclusion is about determining whether the linguistic centre is on left side or right side and not about whether only damages can determine the centre or not.
Join the discussion