BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

For balance

Expert replies
by seamaster1 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:21 am
A company's two divisions performed with remarkable consistency over the past three years: in each of
those years, the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of
profits, and the chemicals division for the balance.
Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past three years from the statement above?
(A) Total dollar sales for each of the company's divisions have remained roughly constant.
(B) The pharmaceuticals division has faced stiffer competition in its markets than has the chemecials division.
(C) The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceuticals division.
(D) The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchaged.
(E) Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of the chemicals division's sales than of those
of the pharmaceuticals divisions.
Please explain " for balance".
Thank you
    Join the discussion
    Source: — Critical Reasoning |

    by aman88 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:49 am
    IMO C

    Pharmaceuticals division:
    Sales: 20%
    Profit: 40%

    For the BALANCE means that the chemical division accounted for:
    Sales: 80%
    Profit: 60%

    Thanks.
    Join the discussion

    by seamaster1 » Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:53 am
    Dear Aman88
    Tk for your explanation.
    FYI, I read OG10 and found out the same answer. However, I can not image the balance means 80%, 60%.
    Please explain more detail.
    thank you.
    Join the discussion

    by aman88 » Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:04 am
    seamaster1 wrote:Dear Aman88
    Tk for your explanation.
    FYI, I read OG10 and found out the same answer. However, I can not image the balance means 80%, 60%.
    Please explain more detail.
    thank you.
    It is very helpful to pick numbers for such questions. 'For the balance' will the be more clear.

    Assume Total sales = $500
    Total profits = $100

    Sales of pharmaceutical division is 20% of dollar sales.
    0.20*500 = $100
    Profits from pharmaceutical division is 40%.
    Profits per dollar of sale = 40/100 = 0.4

    For the balance part:
    Sales of chemical division is 80%.
    0.80*500=400
    Profits from chemical division is 60%.
    Profits per dollar of sale = 60/400 = 0.15

    Compare the profits per dollar sale -> 0.15<0.40

    From this, we can conclude that C is true.
    *you need not do any math in actual, just understand the logic in the question and you'll get it. If required, do math.

    I hope its clear now! :)
    Thanks.
    Join the discussion

    by seamaster1 » Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:57 am
    Greeting Aman88
    It is great explanation.
    Thank a lot for your help.
    Best Regards.
    Join the discussion