BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Expert Advice needed

Expert replies
by akash singhal » Sat Oct 17, 2015 9:39 pm
The analyst suggested that traders pay more attention to a broader measure of the money supply, known as M2, but still not to ignore standard indicators.

A. but still not to ignore
B. and not to ignore any longer
C. but that they still not ignore
D. and that they continue not to ignore
E. but they should still not ignore


Please explain. Correct ans: C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Oct 19, 2015 7:20 am
This question is testing PARALLELISM.

The analyst is suggesting that traders do 2 things: 1) pay more attention, 2) not ignore standard indicators. We have to make sure that both list elements work with the ROOT PHRASE "The analyst suggested..." We want a structure that reads "The analysts suggested that traders ____ but not ____."

Since only the second part is underlined, just check each answer choice against the root phrase:

A. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but still not to ignore... Not parallel.

B. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... and not to ignore any longer... Not parallel.

C. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but that they still not ignore... Parallel!

D. The analysts suggested that traders ____ .... and that they continue not to ignore... Parallel, but the meaning changed. We want the contrast of "but," not "and."

E. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but they should still not ignore... Not parallel.

The answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by akash singhal » Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:40 pm
ceilidh.erickson wrote:This question is testing PARALLELISM.

The analyst is suggesting that traders do 2 things: 1) pay more attention, 2) not ignore standard indicators. We have to make sure that both list elements work with the ROOT PHRASE "The analyst suggested..." We want a structure that reads "The analysts suggested that traders ____ but not ____."

Since only the second part is underlined, just check each answer choice against the root phrase:

A. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but still not to ignore... Not parallel.

B. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... and not to ignore any longer... Not parallel.

C. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but that they still not ignore... Parallel!

D. The analysts suggested that traders ____ .... and that they continue not to ignore... Parallel, but the meaning changed. We want the contrast of "but," not "and."

E. The analysts suggested that traders ____ ... but they should still not ignore... Not parallel.

The answer is C.
I get this is about parallelism but my approach was since 'they' in C,D and E pointed back to the analysts (because of plausible parallelism) i eliminated C,D and E while then A and B didnt make any sense. Am I right?
If and,but and or is followed by a pronoun then its antecedent is the subject of the previous independent sentence irrespective of the other plural nouns(no ambiguity).

For Ex.. Although badgers have a history of terrorizing foxes,wolves and mountain lions,they are known to hide when approached by rabbits.
Here bold parts are all perfect antecedent candidates for 'they' but because of plausible parallelism 'they' only refers to the 'badgers',its rightful antecedent.
Please explain my mistake in reasoning..
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:01 am
Pronoun ambiguity is a tricky topic.

In the example that you gave, the THEY would be referring to badgers. The contrast in the sentence only makes sense if badgers terrorize certain animals but hide from others. Because THEY is performing the action in the second clause, it makes most sense for it to be replacing the SUBJECT (badgers) from the first clause.

In the sentence about traders and analysts, though, I think the structure is different. If we say "Analysts suggest that traders ____ but that they not ____," the THEY is in a subordinate clause beginning with "that" just as "traders" was prior. The structure "suggest THAT _______ but THAT _______" implies that we want the subordinate clauses to be parallel to each other. Thus, it makes more sense / is more parallel for THEY to replace TRADERS.

Did that clarify it?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1