BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Environmentalist - Privatization

Expert replies
by ronnie1985 » Sun May 20, 2012 10:07 am
Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that
conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were
put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the
government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against
the suggestion above?

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks
might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their
leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve
conservation objectives.
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to
seek contributions from major donors and general public.
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain
park areas.
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best
efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by
insufficient resources.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Sun May 20, 2012 11:23 am
IMO: A
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:38 am
Direct (A)
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:53 am
I dont know what this prob tests? IMO A though.
Join the discussion

by nitingoel » Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:48 am
(A) is my pick too.

Regards
NItin
Join the discussion

by Birottam Dutta » Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:50 am
So, lets try and explain this interesting problem :)

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that
conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were
put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the
government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against
the suggestion above?

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks
might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their
leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve
conservation objectives.
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to
seek contributions from major donors and general public.
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain
park areas.
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best
efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by
insufficient resources.

The conclusion here is that conservation objectives of the national park would be better achieved if private enterprises were put in charge of the park rather than government bodies.

A-- Says that if private entities are put in charge, then the objectives itself may get abolished because people seeking to abolish all restrictions may join the private enterprises. This directly refutes the conclusion and is the best weakener. SO A is correct.
B--- says that private entities may not agree on arriving at the best way to achieve conservation objectives but this does not necessarily mean that the objectives cannot be met. B is a close second but then we have a better choice in A, so we can leave it alone.
C--- talks about fundraising and that is not the issue at hand.
D--- is again out of context.
E--- is totally out of context.


So, as agreed by everyone above me aswell, answer IMHO is A!!!
Join the discussion