BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

enriched flour

Expert replies
by Bek » Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:53 am
Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."


A) Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
B) Bleached, enriched flour is almost more devoid of nutritional value than sugar, and much more than likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
C) Bleached, enriched flour's nutritional value is nearly as low as that of sugar, and this type of flour is much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
D) Bleached, enriched flour is almost as equivalently low in nutritional value as sugar, and much more likely than appearing in foods labeled "sugar-free."
E) Sugar's nutritional value is even lower than that of bleached, enriched flour, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."

Source - grockit.com/gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Bek » Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:53 am
OA is C
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:49 am
how can the opening phrase " Bleached " modify nutritional value in C
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by blackjack » Tue Aug 09, 2011 8:26 am
All of them seem to be incorrect. :(
Join the discussion

by quesarasara » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:25 am
I think bleached enriched are adjectives of flour.

Drunk man's alcohol is over.

Oh yeah...Now I understand where you guys are coming from. Here the noun is man's alcohol...so saying drunk alcohol is not correct...

Got it...So yeah the question seems incorrect.

Can we have some Grockit expert comment on it...
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:28 am
quesarasara wrote:I think bleached enriched are adjectives of flour.

Drunk man's alcohol is over.

Oh yeah...Now I understand where you guys are coming from. Here the noun is man's alcohol...so saying drunk alcohol is not correct...

Got it...So yeah the question seems incorrect.

Can we have some Grockit expert comment on it...
bleached is past participle modifier. It modifies the subject of the following clause
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:41 am
IMO A

how we can assume that sentence is comparing about low it could be high.

can any one help in this.
Join the discussion

by kzos » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:25 am
[email protected] wrote:IMO A

how we can assume that sentence is comparing about low it could be high.

can any one help in this.
I believe A is wrong because verb is missing. It seems among the answers choices C is the most closest.
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:27 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:48 am
Bek wrote:Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."


A) Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."------> awkward
B) Bleached, enriched flour is almost more devoid of nutritional value than sugar, and much more than likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."--------> wrong comparison
C) Bleached, enriched flour's nutritional value is nearly as low as that of sugar, and this type of flour is much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
D) Bleached, enriched flour is almost as equivalently low in nutritional value as sugar, and much more likely than appearing in foods labeled "sugar-free."
E) Sugar's nutritional value is even lower than that of bleached, enriched flour, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."

Best option is C
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:56 pm
We can compare flour to sugar and flour's nutritional value to sugar's nutritional value, but we can't compare an ingredient to nutritional value, so A has a faulty comparison.

The MEANING here is that flour's nutritional value is only slightly better than sugar's.

There is a lot of awkwardness in the wrong choices, as aspirant points out. "almost more devoid...than" in B and "as equivalently low" in D are unclear.

In E, the meaning is again unclear since it implies that the nutritional value of sugar would be more likely to appear in 'sugar-free' foods, when in fact it is the flour.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by crick » Sun Aug 14, 2011 4:36 am
Arrived at C in almost 3 minutes. Good question.

Crick
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:26 pm
Bek wrote:Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."


A) Bleached, enriched flour, almost like sugar's nutritional value, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
B) Bleached, enriched flour is almost more devoid of nutritional value than sugar, and much more than likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
C) Bleached, enriched flour's nutritional value is nearly as low as that of sugar, and this type of flour is much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."
D) Bleached, enriched flour is almost as equivalently low in nutritional value as sugar, and much more likely than appearing in foods labeled "sugar-free."
E) Sugar's nutritional value is even lower than that of bleached, enriched flour, and much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."

Source - grockit.com/gmat
IMO A/B/D are all FRAGMENTS

IMO C is close but IS INCORRECT AS "Bleached, enriched flour's nutritional value is nearly as low as that of sugar, and this type of flour IS/ARE much more likely to appear in foods labeled "sugar-free."

IMO E

Pls share your views.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1