BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Elite official CR Revision Question # 5

Expert replies
by richachampion » Fri Aug 04, 2017 3:22 am
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may, in fact, make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida's coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by richachampion » Fri Aug 04, 2017 3:47 am
OA: E
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Aug 04, 2017 6:45 am
richachampion wrote:Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may, in fact, make things worse rather than better.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats.
B. Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
C. Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida's coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population.
D. The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
E. When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
Argument summary:
Premise: Manatees swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats.
Premise: To address the problem, boats should travel at very low speeds.
Premise: Manatees can't hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.
Conclusion: Reducing boat speeds may make things worse.

Question stem: Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?

A. has no effect on the conclusion
B. unrelated to conclusion about whether slow boats will make things worse
C. doesn't effect the conclusion about whether slow boats will make things worse
D. doesn't effect the conclusion about whether slow boats will make things worse
E. NICE. The idea behind the author's conclusion is that manatees may be able to at least HEAR fast-moving boats approaching and get out of the way. So, if slow-moving boats are very silent, the manatees will not hear them and will get hit. Answer choice E says that manatees don't hear fast-moving boats and they don't hear slow-moving boats. That significantly weakens the author's conclusion.

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Sat Aug 05, 2017 12:50 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Answer choice E says that manatees don't hear fast-moving boats and they don't hear slow-moving boats. That significantly weakens the author's conclusion.

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
sir, this is my take =

Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may, in fact, make things worse rather than better.

To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. :This solution was predicted assuming that it is the high-speed collisions that cause the death of Manatees.

however, the logic where the above is contradicted is quite inappropriate.

Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. →
They are trying to conclude that the cause of the deaths is collisions: high-speed or low-speed collisions and the chances of collision will increase with the slow speed as M's will not be able to hear the boat sound. This is quite different than what has established above: High-speed collisions are responsible for deaths.

so, our job is to find an option that says the sound of the boat has no proportionality to the deaths of M's.
Right Sir?
Last edited by richachampion on Sat Aug 05, 2017 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Sat Aug 05, 2017 1:59 am
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may, in fact, make things worse rather than better.

are frequently killed in collisions with boats. → How can the collisions be stopped or minimized?

To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. : This solution was predicted assuming that it is the high-speed collisions that cause the death of Manatees.

Then suddenly a new argument is introduced to contradict the solution →

Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.

But the truth is that this argument has no connection with the argument and solution established above: speed and collision and death.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:41 am
richachampion wrote:Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may, in fact, make things worse rather than better.

are frequently killed in collisions with boats. → How can the collisions be stopped or minimized?

To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. : This solution was predicted assuming that it is the high-speed collisions that cause the death of Manatees.

Then suddenly a new argument is introduced to contradict the solution →

Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat's sound lowers in pitch as the boat slows.

But the truth is that this argument has no connection with the argument and solution established above: speed and collision and death.
It might be helpful to consider a simpler version of the logic.

Imagine there's an epidemic in a particular neighborhood of small children getting hit by cars. The proposed solution: lower the speed limit. Now someone in the neighborhood insists that this solution will make the problem worse, as slower cars make less noise and so the kids won't hear the cars coming.

If it turned out that all the kids playing in the street had earbuds in and so couldn't hear the cars even when they were driving fast, then we know that the speed limit won't make things worse. The kids never heard the cars in the first place, and so the fact that there are quieter cars doesn't present a new problem.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion