Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Easy DS 1

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:47 pm
Thanked: 1 times
by roy_priya » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:27 pm
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

My answer was D while the OA is [spoiler]A[/spoiler]. Not sure why? Please help
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3224
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pmFollowed by: 614 members
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
GMAT Score:800

Re: Easy DS 1

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:57 pm
roy_priya wrote:A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

My answer was D while the OA is A. Not sure why? Please help
(2) isn't sufficient because the stem tell us that the bracelet was initially offered for sale at a price that would bring a 40% profit. Knowing the actual sale price doesn't tell us what the initial price was.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:24 am
Thanked: 1 times

by oks » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:27 pm
I'm still not very clear on the explanation. My answer was D as well.

How would express this through the algebraic formula Profit = Sale - Cost?
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times

by niraj_a » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:53 am
i think stuart is pointing to the language of the question.

i guess statement (2) is insufficient because the price mentioned could easily correspond to a % profit other than 40%.

this is a :twisted: little trap
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:06 am
Thanked: 1 times

by GG04 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:44 am
source please!
Top
Join the discussion