BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - Word Problem

Expert replies
by willshu » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:13 pm
The following question is from a Kaplan CAT. I do not agree with the answer, can someone see if they agree or disagree? To me (2) is simply a ratio that doesn't indicate the total cost of typewriters and calculators, but please let me know if you disagree.

A business bought r typewriters at $100 per typewriter and s calculators at $50 per calculator. What is the total cost of the typewriters and calculators?

(1) The s calculators cost $200

(2) 2 r + s = 10
Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

[Show/hide explanation]

You're given the price of a typewriter and the price of a calculator. You're asked for the total cost of the typewriters and calculators, which can be written as 100 r + 50 s . Statement (1) tells you that the calculators cost $200. You can use this information to solve for s , but you can't find the total cost, so (1) is insufficient. Statement (2) tells you that 2 r + s = 10. Notice that the coefficients in the statement, 2 for r and 1 for s , are in the same ratio as the expression you derived from the stem. In fact, if you multiply both sides of the equation of statement (2) by 50, you'll get 100 r + 50 s = 500. This gives us the total cost of the calculators and typewriters, so (2) is sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS - Word Problem

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:30 pm
willshu wrote:The following question is from a Kaplan CAT. I do not agree with the answer, can someone see if they agree or disagree? To me (2) is simply a ratio that doesn't indicate the total cost of typewriters and calculators, but please let me know if you disagree.

A business bought r typewriters at $100 per typewriter and s calculators at $50 per calculator. What is the total cost of the typewriters and calculators?

(1) The s calculators cost $200

(2) 2 r + s = 10
Since it's a Kaplan question, let's use the Kaplan 3-step method for DS!

Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Focus on the question stem

We need the total cost of the objects. We see that a common formula applies, so let's start by jotting that down:

Total Cost = price(1)*quantity(1) + price(2)*quantity(2) + price(3)*quantity(3) + ...

Plugging our info in:

Total Cost = 100r + 50s

Many people would stop there (well, many people wouldn't even get thar far!), but if we go one step further this question becomes a snap:

Total Cost = 50(2r + s)

To summarize:

we have 3 variables and 1 equation. To solve, we either need 2 more distinct linear equations or 1 special equation that eliminates both variables we don't want (r and s).

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Consider each statement by itself

(1) total cost of the calculators is $200.

Well, that eliminates the "s" from our equation, but still leaves us with 2 variables: total cost and r... insufficient!

(2) 2r + s = 10

For those who didn't break down the question as we did in step 1, this may seem like just another generic equation, leaving us with 2 equations and 3 unknowns. Those people would think (2) were insufficient.

However, our equation is:

Total Cost = 50(2r + s)

Now that we know that 2r + s = 10, we can simply sub that into our equation to get:

Total cost = 50(10), which certainly gives us a specific value for total cost... sufficient!

(2) is sufficient alone, (1) isn't: choose B.

(For those of you on the edge of your seats wondering about Step 3 of the Kaplan Method for DS, it's "if necessary, combine the statements". On this question one of the statements was sufficient by itself, so there's no need for combination.)
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Re: DS - Word Problem

by willshu » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:41 pm
Thanks -- your explanation makes a lot of sense.
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
willshu wrote:The following question is from a Kaplan CAT. I do not agree with the answer, can someone see if they agree or disagree? To me (2) is simply a ratio that doesn't indicate the total cost of typewriters and calculators, but please let me know if you disagree.

A business bought r typewriters at $100 per typewriter and s calculators at $50 per calculator. What is the total cost of the typewriters and calculators?

(1) The s calculators cost $200

(2) 2 r + s = 10
Since it's a Kaplan question, let's use the Kaplan 3-step method for DS!

Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Focus on the question stem

We need the total cost of the objects. We see that a common formula applies, so let's start by jotting that down:

Total Cost = price(1)*quantity(1) + price(2)*quantity(2) + price(3)*quantity(3) + ...

Plugging our info in:

Total Cost = 100r + 50s

Many people would stop there (well, many people wouldn't even get thar far!), but if we go one step further this question becomes a snap:

Total Cost = 50(2r + s)

To summarize:

we have 3 variables and 1 equation. To solve, we either need 2 more distinct linear equations or 1 special equation that eliminates both variables we don't want (r and s).

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: Consider each statement by itself

(1) total cost of the calculators is $200.

Well, that eliminates the "s" from our equation, but still leaves us with 2 variables: total cost and r... insufficient!

(2) 2r + s = 10

For those who didn't break down the question as we did in step 1, this may seem like just another generic equation, leaving us with 2 equations and 3 unknowns. Those people would think (2) were insufficient.

However, our equation is:

Total Cost = 50(2r + s)

Now that we know that 2r + s = 10, we can simply sub that into our equation to get:

Total cost = 50(10), which certainly gives us a specific value for total cost... sufficient!

(2) is sufficient alone, (1) isn't: choose B.

(For those of you on the edge of your seats wondering about Step 3 of the Kaplan Method for DS, it's "if necessary, combine the statements". On this question one of the statements was sufficient by itself, so there's no need for combination.)
Join the discussion