BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS weakness - Inequalities - advise- taking GMAT this week

Expert replies
by swati.arunahuja » Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:09 am
Hi,

I'm particularly weak in the DS questions pertaining to Inequalities. Would any have any last minute piece of advise for me?
Also, I'm taking the test dayafter, so your last minute advise is most welcome:)
Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

swati.arunahuja wrote:Hi,

I'm particularly weak in the DS questions pertaining to Inequalities. Would any have any last minute piece of advise for me?
Also, I'm taking the test dayafter, so your last minute advise is most welcome:)
Thanks in advance
there are only a couple of things you really have to know about inequalities, but the number of ways in which those things are combined is almost endless.

here are the facts you need to know:

* when you have SIMULTANEOUS INEQUALITIES, here's the simplest guideline to follow:
- ADD only
- MAKE SURE THE INEQUALITY SIGNS FACE THE SAME WAY

for instance, if you are given the inequalities z - 3m > 0 and 4m - z > 0, you can add those in their current state (since both of the inequality signs are "greater than") to yield m > 0.

if you are given, say, a < b and c > d, and you wanted to combine them, you'd simply turn one of them around by multiplying by a negative quantity, usually -1:
-a > -b
c > d
add: c - a > d - b
there are rules you could memorize for subtracting inequalities, but they're a pain - you have to make sure the inequality signs are facing opposite ways, and, worse yet, you have to know which way the sign is supposed to face after you perform the subtraction. that is not friendly - and it produces the same result as multiplying one side by -1 and then adding anyway.

* do not ever forget to FLIP THE INEQUALITY SIGN when you MULTIPLY OR DIVIDE BY A NEGATIVE NUMBER.
also, corollary: if you DON'T KNOW THE SIGN OF A VARIABLE in an inequality, YOU CAN'T DIVIDE OR MULTIPLY BY IT.
this means that you can't "cross multiply" most inequalities, because cross multiplying is really multiplying by both denominators.
see https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/if- ... t2997.html for a problem of this type, on which i made copious comments about what you can and can't do with inequalities (sorry for the cross posting).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

lunarpower wrote:
swati.arunahuja wrote:Hi,

I'm particularly weak in the DS questions pertaining to Inequalities. Would any have any last minute piece of advise for me?
Also, I'm taking the test dayafter, so your last minute advise is most welcome:)
Thanks in advance
there are only a couple of things you really have to know about inequalities, but the number of ways in which those things are combined is almost endless.

here are the facts you need to know:

* when you have SIMULTANEOUS INEQUALITIES, here's the simplest guideline to follow:
- ADD only
- MAKE SURE THE INEQUALITY SIGNS FACE THE SAME WAY

for instance, if you are given the inequalities z - 3m > 0 and 4m - z > 0, you can add those in their current state (since both of the inequality signs are "greater than") to yield m > 0.

if you are given, say, a < b and c > d, and you wanted to combine them, you'd simply turn one of them around by multiplying by a negative quantity, usually -1:
-a > -b
c > d
add: c - a > d - b
there are rules you could memorize for subtracting inequalities, but they're a pain - you have to make sure the inequality signs are facing opposite ways, and, worse yet, you have to know which way the sign is supposed to face after you perform the subtraction. that is not friendly - and it produces the same result as multiplying one side by -1 and then adding anyway.

* do not ever forget to FLIP THE INEQUALITY SIGN when you MULTIPLY OR DIVIDE BY A NEGATIVE NUMBER.
also, corollary: if you DON'T KNOW THE SIGN OF A VARIABLE in an inequality, YOU CAN'T DIVIDE OR MULTIPLY BY IT.
this means that you can't "cross multiply" most inequalities, because cross multiplying is really multiplying by both denominators.
see https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/if- ... t2997.html for a problem of this type, on which i made copious comments about what you can and can't do with inequalities (sorry for the cross posting).
Thanks a lot Ron
Join the discussion

lunarpower wrote:
swati.arunahuja wrote:Hi,

I'm particularly weak in the DS questions pertaining to Inequalities. Would any have any last minute piece of advise for me?
Also, I'm taking the test dayafter, so your last minute advise is most welcome:)
Thanks in advance
there are only a couple of things you really have to know about inequalities, but the number of ways in which those things are combined is almost endless.

here are the facts you need to know:

* when you have SIMULTANEOUS INEQUALITIES, here's the simplest guideline to follow:
- ADD only
- MAKE SURE THE INEQUALITY SIGNS FACE THE SAME WAY

for instance, if you are given the inequalities z - 3m > 0 and 4m - z > 0, you can add those in their current state (since both of the inequality signs are "greater than") to yield m > 0.

if you are given, say, a < b and c > d, and you wanted to combine them, you'd simply turn one of them around by multiplying by a negative quantity, usually -1:
-a > -b
c > d
add: c - a > d - b
there are rules you could memorize for subtracting inequalities, but they're a pain - you have to make sure the inequality signs are facing opposite ways, and, worse yet, you have to know which way the sign is supposed to face after you perform the subtraction. that is not friendly - and it produces the same result as multiplying one side by -1 and then adding anyway.

* do not ever forget to FLIP THE INEQUALITY SIGN when you MULTIPLY OR DIVIDE BY A NEGATIVE NUMBER.
also, corollary: if you DON'T KNOW THE SIGN OF A VARIABLE in an inequality, YOU CAN'T DIVIDE OR MULTIPLY BY IT.
this means that you can't "cross multiply" most inequalities, because cross multiplying is really multiplying by both denominators.
see https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/if- ... t2997.html for a problem of this type, on which i made copious comments about what you can and can't do with inequalities (sorry for the cross posting).
Thanks a lot Ron
Join the discussion

lunarpower wrote:
swati.arunahuja wrote:Hi,

I'm particularly weak in the DS questions pertaining to Inequalities. Would any have any last minute piece of advise for me?
Also, I'm taking the test dayafter, so your last minute advise is most welcome:)
Thanks in advance
there are only a couple of things you really have to know about inequalities, but the number of ways in which those things are combined is almost endless.

here are the facts you need to know:

* when you have SIMULTANEOUS INEQUALITIES, here's the simplest guideline to follow:
- ADD only
- MAKE SURE THE INEQUALITY SIGNS FACE THE SAME WAY

for instance, if you are given the inequalities z - 3m > 0 and 4m - z > 0, you can add those in their current state (since both of the inequality signs are "greater than") to yield m > 0.

if you are given, say, a < b and c > d, and you wanted to combine them, you'd simply turn one of them around by multiplying by a negative quantity, usually -1:
-a > -b
c > d
add: c - a > d - b
there are rules you could memorize for subtracting inequalities, but they're a pain - you have to make sure the inequality signs are facing opposite ways, and, worse yet, you have to know which way the sign is supposed to face after you perform the subtraction. that is not friendly - and it produces the same result as multiplying one side by -1 and then adding anyway.

* do not ever forget to FLIP THE INEQUALITY SIGN when you MULTIPLY OR DIVIDE BY A NEGATIVE NUMBER.
also, corollary: if you DON'T KNOW THE SIGN OF A VARIABLE in an inequality, YOU CAN'T DIVIDE OR MULTIPLY BY IT.
this means that you can't "cross multiply" most inequalities, because cross multiplying is really multiplying by both denominators.
see https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/if- ... t2997.html for a problem of this type, on which i made copious comments about what you can and can't do with inequalities (sorry for the cross posting).
Thanks a lot Ron
Join the discussion

by JDesai01 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:04 pm
lunarpower- this was a enormously helpful post. Do you have other helpful thoughts like this aggregated somewhere? Seriously, thanks a ton, this has really helped how I approach inequality questions.

And thanks to whoever asked the question!
Join the discussion

by sumithshah » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:03 pm
Ron

Can you throw some light on the rules of subtracting in equalities?
Join the discussion