BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bomond » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:45 am
There is one way if you want. But it's a bit odd.

ST 1. In order to avoid model square(sorry can't express) the both sides
(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2+2x+1=4x^2-8x-4
3x^2-10x-5=0
appr. x1=-1/3 x2=3.5 INSUFF

ST 2. Same way
(x-3)^2 ≠0
x ≠3 INSUFF

BOTH INSUFF

I go for E
Join the discussion

by gmattester » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:50 am
No this is not odd....
This is an excellent method but I am not sure I can apply this method for every absolute value question.
I mean to say something generic which I can apply to all absolute questions
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:08 pm
bomond wrote:There is one way if you want. But it's a bit odd.

ST 1. In order to avoid model square(sorry can't express) the both sides
(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2+2x+1=4x^2-8x-4
Math is a bit off:

(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2 + 2x + 1 = (2x - 2)^2
x^2 + 2x + 1 = 4(x^2) - 8x + 4
0 = 3(x^2) - 10x + 3
0 = (3x - 1) (x - 3)
3x = 1 or x = 3
x = 1/3 or x = 3

x may or may not be between -1 and +1.. insufficient.

However, when we combine with:

(2) x ≠ 3

we know that the only possible value of x is 1/3, so choose (c): together the statements are sufficient.

In fact, (c) is a great strategic guess on this question, long before doing all the math.

Statement (2) seems pretty random, so either we're being given a totally useless piece of information or x ≠ 3 will eliminate a possibility from (1). As soon as we see that (1) can be turned into a quadratic, we should anticipate that (1) will give us two values for x (so will be insufficient) and (2) will narrow it down to just one possibility.

The better you know the GMAT, the less work you'll need to do to confidently pick up points. Knowing how and when to guess strategically is a huge advantage on test day.

To go back to the original poster's question, yes, squaring both sides of an absolute value equation is often a great approach to these questions.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Re: DS

by Ian Stewart » Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:18 pm
gmattester wrote:Is lxl< 1?
(1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l
(2) lx - 3l &#8800; 0

Besides plugging values, can someone tell me another method how to solve absolute values questions.
There is another way, which I use on pretty much every absolute value GMAT question, but you'd want to practice it a bit before beginning to use it on a test. Remember that |x| is the distance between x and zero on the number line, and |x-y| is the distance between x and y on the number line. If you understand these two facts, you can change many problems about absolute value into problems about distances on the number line, and you can bypass the algebra altogether. Doing that here:

Is |x| < 1? --> Is x less than 1 away from zero?

1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l ---> lx - (-1)l = 2lx - 1l

In words this says "the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1", or phrased more simply, "x is twice as far from -1 as x is from 1". If you draw a number line, you'll see there are two places x could be: between -1 and 1 (but closer to 1), or to the right of 1. It's not difficult to see that x = 3 is one of the two solutions. Insufficient.

2) tells us x is not 3. Insufficient.

Together, there is only one possible solution, the point between -1 and 1, so the answer is yes, |x| < 1, and the two statements are sufficient together. C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by bomond » Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:59 am
I'm sorry gmattester. I made a calculation mistake. Thanks to Stuart, I got it.

Ian Stewart! Do you think your method is always helpful

How do you approach to this problem: |x-1|=|2x+3| (instead lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l)
Join the discussion