Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS

Expert replies
by gmattester » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:17 am
Is lxl< 1?
(1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l
(2) lx - 3l &#8800; 0

Besides plugging values, can someone tell me another method how to solve absolute values questions.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bomond » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:45 am
There is one way if you want. But it's a bit odd.

ST 1. In order to avoid model square(sorry can't express) the both sides
(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2+2x+1=4x^2-8x-4
3x^2-10x-5=0
appr. x1=-1/3 x2=3.5 INSUFF

ST 2. Same way
(x-3)^2 &#8800;0
x &#8800;3 INSUFF

BOTH INSUFF

I go for E
Join the discussion

by gmattester » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:50 am
No this is not odd....
This is an excellent method but I am not sure I can apply this method for every absolute value question.
I mean to say something generic which I can apply to all absolute questions
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:08 pm
bomond wrote:There is one way if you want. But it's a bit odd.

ST 1. In order to avoid model square(sorry can't express) the both sides
(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2+2x+1=4x^2-8x-4
Math is a bit off:

(x+1)^2=(2(x-1))^2
x^2 + 2x + 1 = (2x - 2)^2
x^2 + 2x + 1 = 4(x^2) - 8x + 4
0 = 3(x^2) - 10x + 3
0 = (3x - 1) (x - 3)
3x = 1 or x = 3
x = 1/3 or x = 3

x may or may not be between -1 and +1.. insufficient.

However, when we combine with:

(2) x &#8800; 3

we know that the only possible value of x is 1/3, so choose (c): together the statements are sufficient.

In fact, (c) is a great strategic guess on this question, long before doing all the math.

Statement (2) seems pretty random, so either we're being given a totally useless piece of information or x &#8800; 3 will eliminate a possibility from (1). As soon as we see that (1) can be turned into a quadratic, we should anticipate that (1) will give us two values for x (so will be insufficient) and (2) will narrow it down to just one possibility.

The better you know the GMAT, the less work you'll need to do to confidently pick up points. Knowing how and when to guess strategically is a huge advantage on test day.

To go back to the original poster's question, yes, squaring both sides of an absolute value equation is often a great approach to these questions.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Re: DS

by Ian Stewart » Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:18 pm
gmattester wrote:Is lxl< 1?
(1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l
(2) lx - 3l &#8800; 0

Besides plugging values, can someone tell me another method how to solve absolute values questions.
There is another way, which I use on pretty much every absolute value GMAT question, but you'd want to practice it a bit before beginning to use it on a test. Remember that |x| is the distance between x and zero on the number line, and |x-y| is the distance between x and y on the number line. If you understand these two facts, you can change many problems about absolute value into problems about distances on the number line, and you can bypass the algebra altogether. Doing that here:

Is |x| < 1? --> Is x less than 1 away from zero?

1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l ---> lx - (-1)l = 2lx - 1l

In words this says "the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1", or phrased more simply, "x is twice as far from -1 as x is from 1". If you draw a number line, you'll see there are two places x could be: between -1 and 1 (but closer to 1), or to the right of 1. It's not difficult to see that x = 3 is one of the two solutions. Insufficient.

2) tells us x is not 3. Insufficient.

Together, there is only one possible solution, the point between -1 and 1, so the answer is yes, |x| < 1, and the two statements are sufficient together. C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by bomond » Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:59 am
I'm sorry gmattester. I made a calculation mistake. Thanks to Stuart, I got it.

Ian Stewart! Do you think your method is always helpful

How do you approach to this problem: |x-1|=|2x+3| (instead lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l)
Join the discussion