Is x > 0?
(1) |x+3|<4 (2) |x-3|<4
E
I was able to get the answer but with a bit of guess work. Should one be assuming that x can be a non-integer between 0 and 1?
Inequalities + Absolute Value questoin
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Mike@Magoosh
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
- Location: Berkeley, CA
- Thanked: 387 times
- Followed by:140 members
Hi! I'm happy to contribute on this one.
First of all, if you are doing guesswork plugging in numbers for x, then always always consider fractions less than one as one possibility. Often those numbers behave differently from other numbers, and can be a conclusion-changer in DS.
As for this particular question, I'll do an algebraic solution in case you are interested.
Question: is x > 0
Statement #1: |x+3|<4
That means that -4 < x + 3 < 4
Subtract 3 from all three conditions, and we have: -7 < x < 1. So, under this condition, x could be negative (down to -7) or positive (between zero and 1). Remember, there's a whole infinity of numbers between zero and 1: please don't forget they're there. By itself, Statement #1 is insufficient.
Statement #2: |x-3|<4
That means that -4 < x - 3 < 4
Add three to all three conditions, and we have -1 < x < 7. So, under this condition, x can be positive (up to 7) or negative (between -1 and 0). Again, another whole infinity of numbers between -1 and zero: don't forget about them! By itself, Statement #2 is insufficient.
Combined Statements #1 & #2
We combine the conditions -7 < x < 1 and -1 < x < 7. To satisfy both of those conditions simultaneously, x must be between -1 and +1: -1 < x < 1. That's the overlap, or intersection, of the two regions. Well, x can still be positive or negative, so even combined, the statements are insufficient. Answer = E.
Does that make sense? Please let me know if you have any questions on what I've said.
Mike
First of all, if you are doing guesswork plugging in numbers for x, then always always consider fractions less than one as one possibility. Often those numbers behave differently from other numbers, and can be a conclusion-changer in DS.
As for this particular question, I'll do an algebraic solution in case you are interested.
Question: is x > 0
Statement #1: |x+3|<4
That means that -4 < x + 3 < 4
Subtract 3 from all three conditions, and we have: -7 < x < 1. So, under this condition, x could be negative (down to -7) or positive (between zero and 1). Remember, there's a whole infinity of numbers between zero and 1: please don't forget they're there. By itself, Statement #1 is insufficient.
Statement #2: |x-3|<4
That means that -4 < x - 3 < 4
Add three to all three conditions, and we have -1 < x < 7. So, under this condition, x can be positive (up to 7) or negative (between -1 and 0). Again, another whole infinity of numbers between -1 and zero: don't forget about them! By itself, Statement #2 is insufficient.
Combined Statements #1 & #2
We combine the conditions -7 < x < 1 and -1 < x < 7. To satisfy both of those conditions simultaneously, x must be between -1 and +1: -1 < x < 1. That's the overlap, or intersection, of the two regions. Well, x can still be positive or negative, so even combined, the statements are insufficient. Answer = E.
Does that make sense? Please let me know if you have any questions on what I've said.
Mike
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
- Thanked: 158 times
- Followed by:21 members
st(1) cases considered x+3>-4 and x+3<4, accordingly x >-7 and x<1 Insuff
st(2) cases considered x-3>-4 and x-3<4, accordingly x>-1 and x<7 Insuff
Combining st(1&2) still Insuff
answering your question: you must not assume 0<x<1, as you need to satisfy x>0 which extends beyond 1 and embraces all positive values through +ve infinity.
st(2) cases considered x-3>-4 and x-3<4, accordingly x>-1 and x<7 Insuff
Combining st(1&2) still Insuff
answering your question: you must not assume 0<x<1, as you need to satisfy x>0 which extends beyond 1 and embraces all positive values through +ve infinity.
adt29 wrote:Is x > 0?
(1) |x+3|<4 (2) |x-3|<4
E
I was able to get the answer but with a bit of guess work. Should one be assuming that x can be a non-integer between 0 and 1?
Success doesn't come overnight!