Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS - Machine X and Machine Y Rate Problem

Expert replies
by TxGMAT » Sat Apr 15, 2017 3:50 pm
Machine X and Y produced identical bottles at different constant rates. Machine X, operating alone for four hours, filled part of a production lot; then Machine Y, operating alone for three hours, finished the lot. How many hours would it have taken machine X operating alone to fill the entire production lot?

(1) Machine X produced 30 bottles/minute
(2) Machine X produced twice as many bottles in four hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:27 am
TxGMAT wrote:Machine X and Y produced identical bottles at different constant rates. Machine X, operating alone for four hours, filled part of a production lot; then Machine Y, operating alone for three hours, finished the lot. How many hours would it have taken machine X operating alone to fill the entire production lot?

(1) Machine X produced 30 bottles/minute
(2) Machine X produced twice as many bottles in four hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours
Statement 1: X produced 30 bottles per minute.
Thus, the work produced by X in 240 minutes = r*t = 30*240.
No information about how much work was produced by Y.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: Machine X produced twice as many bottles in 4 hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours.
Thus, for every bottle Y produced, X produced 2 bottles, implying that X produced 2 of every 3 bottles.
Since X produced 2/3 of the lot in 4 hours, X would need 2 more hours to produce the remaining 1/3 of the lot, for a total of 6 hours.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:09 pm
TxGMAT wrote:Machine X and Y produced identical bottles at different constant rates. Machine X, operating alone for four hours, filled part of a production lot; then Machine Y, operating alone for three hours, finished the lot. How many hours would it have taken machine X operating alone to fill the entire production lot?

(1) Machine X produced 30 bottles/minute
(2) Machine X produced twice as many bottles in four hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours
Hi TxGMAT,

We have: Machine X worked for 4 hours and did some part of the job, and then machine Y worked for 3 hours and did the remaining part of the job.

If we get to know either the part of the job done by machine X or the part of the job done by machine Y, we get the unique answer.

Statement 1: Machine X produced 30 bottles/minute

This is clearly insufficient; there is no information either about the part of job machine X did or about the rate at which machine Y worked.

Statement 2: Machine X produced twice as many bottles in 4 hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours

The statement implies that while working for 4 hours, machine X did 2/3rd of the job, machine Y did the 1/3rd of the job.

This is exactly what the question describes.

Since machine X takes 4 hours to do 2/3rd of the job, it would take 4/2 = 2 hours to do the remaining (1/3rd) part of the job.

Thus, the total time taken by machine X to do the complete job = [spoiler]4 + 2 = 6 hours[/spoiler]ours.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

Relevant book: Manhattan Review GMAT Word Problems Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Frankfurt | Hong Kong | Zurich | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:11 pm
TxGMAT wrote:Machine X and Y produced identical bottles at different constant rates. Machine X, operating alone for four hours, filled part of a production lot; then Machine Y, operating alone for three hours, finished the lot. How many hours would it have taken machine X operating alone to fill the entire production lot?

(1) Machine X produced 30 bottles/minute
(2) Machine X produced twice as many bottles in four hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours
We are given that Machines X and Y produced identical bottles and that Machine X worked for 4 hours filling part of the lot and Machine Y worked for 3 hours filling the rest of the lot. If we let the rate of Machine X in bottles per hour be X and the rate of Machine Y in bottles per hour be Y, we can determine the amount of work done by Machine X and by Machine Y.

rate x time = work

Work done by Machine X = X * 4 = 4X

Work done by Machine Y = Y * 3 = 3Y

Thus, the total work completed = 4X + 3Y.

We need to determine how long it would take Machine X to fill the entire lot. Since the work needed to produce the entire lot is 4X + 3Y and time = work/rate, we can use the following equation to determine the time of Machine X:

Time for Machine X to fill the entire lot = (4X + 3Y)/X

Statement One Alone:

Machine X produced 30 bottles per minute.

This means Machine X produced 30 x 60 = 1800 bottles per hour. Although we know the rate of Machine X, we do not have enough information to determine how long it will take Machine X to fill the entire lot. Statement one alone is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

Machine X produced twice as many bottles in 4 hours as Machine Y produced in 3 hours.

From the given information, we know that work of Machine X = 4X and that work of Machine Y = 3Y. Using those two work values and the information in statement two, we can create the following equation:

4X = 2(3Y)

4X = 6Y

2X = 3Y

Since 2X = 3Y, we can substitute 2X for 3Y in the expression (4X + 3Y)/X. Thus, we have:

(4X + 2X)/X

6X/X

6 = Time for Machine X to fill the entire lot

Statement two alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Answer: B

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion