Can we find better ways to handle this problem.
[spoiler]OA - E; Source: Grockit[/spoiler]
DS - interesting problem
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
My answer is B.If x Φ y = (2x - y)/(2y - x), where x ≠2y, then is (a Φ b) > (b Φ a)?
(1)Â a < b
(2)Â 2a < b
St1 is insufficient (inequality will change sign based on different numbers chosen, for example (a, b) = (1, 3) and (a, b) = (2, 3)).
St2 is sufficient. Both (aΦb) and (bΦa) will be negative, and LHS > RHS.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
sT2 is also not sufficient check with (-5, -1)edge wrote:My answer is B.If x Φ y = (2x - y)/(2y - x), where x ≠2y, then is (a Φ b) > (b Φ a)?
(1)Â a < b
(2)Â 2a < b
St1 is insufficient (inequality will change sign based on different numbers chosen, for example (a, b) = (1, 3) and (a, b) = (2, 3)).
St2 is sufficient. Both (aΦb) and (bΦa) will be negative, and LHS > RHS.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Question: Is (2a-b)/(2b-a) > (2b-a)/(2a-b)?If x Φ y = (2x - y)/(2y - x), where x ≠2y, then is (a Φ b) > (b Φ a)?
(1)Â a < b
(2)Â 2a < b
Look for values that satisfy both statements.
Statements 1 and 2: a < b and 2a < b.
Let a=1 and b=3.
2a-b = 2*1 - 3 = -1.
2b-a = 2*3 - 1 = 5.
Is (2a-b)/(2b-a) > (2b-a)/(2a-b)?
-1/5 > 5/-1
-1/5 > -5.
Yes.
Let a = -3 and b = -1.
2a-b = 2(-3) - (-1) = -5.
2b-a = 2(-1) - (-3) = 1.
Is (2a-b)/(2b-a) > (2b-a)/(2a-b)?
-5/1 > 1/-5
-5 > -1/5.
No.
Since in the first case the answer is Yes and in the second case the answer is No, both statements combined are insufficient.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
hi all. it seems that it is kind of problems in which plugging and obtaining yes and no answer works better than any other ways, i honestly tried to simplify but looks like it does not work here
at first we need to determine
does ((2a-b)/(2b-a))>((2b-a)/2a-b))
after simplify i got
does (a^2-b^2)/((2b-a)(2a-b)) not great relieve....
(1)b=3, a=1. provided that b>a (3>1)
(2-3)/(6-1)=-1/5
(6-1)/2-3)=-5 as a result -1/5>-5 and the answer is yes
but b=1, a=-3 (b>a)
(-6-1)/(2+3)=-7/5
and the right part of the inequality=-5/7, here the answer is no as -7/5<-5/7 so 1 st insuff
(2) the same values for a and b works here as for st1
b=3, a=1.3>2*1, and the answer is yes
b=1, a=-3, 1>2(-3) the answer is no
both: the same values work for combined st
3a<2b
a=1,b=3 3*1<2*3 the answer is yes
a=-3 b=1, 3*(-3)<2*1 the answer is no
so E looks valid answer
at first we need to determine
does ((2a-b)/(2b-a))>((2b-a)/2a-b))
after simplify i got
does (a^2-b^2)/((2b-a)(2a-b)) not great relieve....
(1)b=3, a=1. provided that b>a (3>1)
(2-3)/(6-1)=-1/5
(6-1)/2-3)=-5 as a result -1/5>-5 and the answer is yes
but b=1, a=-3 (b>a)
(-6-1)/(2+3)=-7/5
and the right part of the inequality=-5/7, here the answer is no as -7/5<-5/7 so 1 st insuff
(2) the same values for a and b works here as for st1
b=3, a=1.3>2*1, and the answer is yes
b=1, a=-3, 1>2(-3) the answer is no
both: the same values work for combined st
3a<2b
a=1,b=3 3*1<2*3 the answer is yes
a=-3 b=1, 3*(-3)<2*1 the answer is no
so E looks valid answer
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
Thanks Mitch. I always enjoy the simplicity of all your posts. Thanks.
Could you suggest how shall we pick nos to solve DS problems, esp when the problem involves 2 variables. Do you recommend some standard approach for the same.
thanks.
Patanjali
- sl750
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
- Thanked: 38 times
- Followed by:1 members
The question asks whether 3(a-b)(a+b)/(2b-a)(2a-b) > 0 ?
For statement 1 a<b,
a=1,b=3 (For b=2, we get a divide by zero)
3(-2)(4)/(5)(-1) > 0
a=-3,b=-1
3(-2)(-4)/(1)(-5) < 0. eliminate A and D
For statement 2 2a<b,
a=1,b=3, we get a yes,
a=-3,b=-1, we get a no. eliminate B
Combining both, we don't get any new information. So answer is E
For statement 1 a<b,
a=1,b=3 (For b=2, we get a divide by zero)
3(-2)(4)/(5)(-1) > 0
a=-3,b=-1
3(-2)(-4)/(1)(-5) < 0. eliminate A and D
For statement 2 2a<b,
a=1,b=3, we get a yes,
a=-3,b=-1, we get a no. eliminate B
Combining both, we don't get any new information. So answer is E
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Try to determine what's being tested.patanjali.purpose wrote:
Thanks Mitch. I always enjoy the simplicity of all your posts. Thanks.
Could you suggest how shall we pick nos to solve DS problems, esp when the problem involves 2 variables. Do you recommend some standard approach for the same.
thanks.
Patanjali
The DS question above is about inequalities: whether one value is greater than another.
Both a and b are being subtracted.
Subtracting a positive number yields a decrease; subtracting a negative number yields an increase.
Hence the approach that I used above: trying both positive and negative values for a and b that satisfy the two statements.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
- Thanked: 158 times
- Followed by:21 members
IF a(b)=(2a-b)/(2b-a) THEN b(a)=(2a- (2a-b)/(2b-a)) / (2*(2a-b)/(2b-a) - a)
Simplifying, b(a)=b/(2b-a) / (2a-b)/(b-a) = b(b-a) / (2b-a)(2a-b)
We compare a(b) and b(a) OR (2a-b)/(2b-a) and b(b-a) / (2b-a)(2a-b)
We may cancel out (2b-a) in the denominators to get (2a-b) and b(b-a)/(2a-b)
Further we may notice that (2a-b) is repeated in the numerator and denominator, so we handle it as (2a-b)^2 and b(b-a)
The main question is whether (2a-b)^2 > b(b-a), we can immediately check that if b(b-a)<0 then the answer is Yes, because the LHS will be squared and positive.
St(1) a<b implies that a is less than b merely, and we don't know either the value nor the sign of b. Hence Insuff
St(2) 2a<b the same as statement 1
Combining both we get no additional info, hence answer is E
Simplifying, b(a)=b/(2b-a) / (2a-b)/(b-a) = b(b-a) / (2b-a)(2a-b)
We compare a(b) and b(a) OR (2a-b)/(2b-a) and b(b-a) / (2b-a)(2a-b)
We may cancel out (2b-a) in the denominators to get (2a-b) and b(b-a)/(2a-b)
Further we may notice that (2a-b) is repeated in the numerator and denominator, so we handle it as (2a-b)^2 and b(b-a)
The main question is whether (2a-b)^2 > b(b-a), we can immediately check that if b(b-a)<0 then the answer is Yes, because the LHS will be squared and positive.
St(1) a<b implies that a is less than b merely, and we don't know either the value nor the sign of b. Hence Insuff
St(2) 2a<b the same as statement 1
Combining both we get no additional info, hence answer is E
- Attachments
-
- Function.doc
- (32 KiB) Downloaded 87 times
Success doesn't come overnight!