BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - Driving 1.5 times slower

Expert replies
by s_raizada » Thu May 29, 2008 12:56 pm
Driving 1.5 times slower, Bill was late for school today. What is the usual time it takes Bill to drive to school? (Assume that each day Bill takes the same route).

1) It took Bill 15 more minutes to drive to school today than usually
2) The distance between home and school is 15 miles


Please explain using example.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Fri May 30, 2008 12:13 am
A is ans here.

From 1: 2.5vt=v(t+1/4) solve for t.So sufficient. (assume v=speed in km ; t=time in hrs; distance=v*t)

Also if v=the slower speed then actual speed is 1.5 times more i.e. (v+1.5v)=2.5V (actual usual speed); (1/4hr=15min)
Join the discussion

by aatech » Fri May 30, 2008 6:28 am
A for me too

Suppose distance is d miles and his usual speed is s miles/hour

So, usual time = d/s hours

Today he drove at a speed of s/1.5 miles/hour

Stmt 1 - d/(s/1.5) = d/s + 15/60 solve for d/s SUFF

Stmt 2 - d = 15 miles... nothign else can be determined NOT SUFF
Join the discussion

by s_raizada » Fri May 30, 2008 8:18 am
I had hard time figuring out what exactly 1.5 times slower mean but now I know.
Join the discussion

by aatech » Fri May 30, 2008 8:19 am
Is A the OA?
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri May 30, 2008 9:27 am
decrease in speed =1.5 => 3/2

INCREASE IN TIME = 2/3 ( as vt=k)

hence 2/3 of usual time = 15 minutes

usual time =

PLEASE LET ME KNOW CAN WE USE THIS APPROACH?

Regards,
CBM
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by s_raizada » Sat May 31, 2008 1:26 am
OA is A
Join the discussion

by airan » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:57 am
Can someone help with a generic strategy to interpret such questions.
Driving 1.5 times slower
, the statement is so confusing ...!
That means bill drives 2.5 times the speed every day ..doesn't fits into the common sense purview of question writing.
Thanks
Airan
Join the discussion

by amitansu » Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:01 am
True , it doesn't fit into the convinient way of saying, but that's not the actual value of speed, it's a way of expression vis'-a-vis' slower speed.

If you take x as the actual speed (which is higher speed) then 1.5 times less would be x-1.5x=-.5x which is not possible.

So, the assuming the slower speed as x then higher speed would be 1.5 times more i.e. 1.5x+x=2.5x

Alwys assume the lower value as x or any other variable in these type of cases, to get a positive value for calculation.

Amit
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:26 am
Yep!. I started out with X-1.5X and was like what? -0.5x??
Join the discussion